Make Full Usage Of Your Articles Reference Field

SEnuke: Ready for action

Today, there is not necessarily something wrong with this, I just believe that authors who are doing this are missing out on possible traffic and/or customers. Such reference boxes will only gain their site ratings in a...

I run a report directory on my site, and I am seeing a growing amount of articles being presented, solely for the backlink given in the Resource Box. This is probably due to the increasing amount of PLR articles and material that is becoming available.

Today, there's not necessarily anything wrong with this, I just think that authors who are doing this are missing out on potential traffic and/or consumers. Such reference boxes is only going to benefit their site ranks in incoming links that are valued by any search engine.

Is this a bad thing? No. Where they are losing out is as follows.

Much of the traffic to my article directory comes from search engines, by people searching for info on a certain topic. Now, this user types within their keywords, clicks on the search box, and is given a list of related sites. They selected one, and are taken up to the author's article. Does Linklicious.Me Work includes further concerning the reason for this idea. They browse the article about, say, snowboarding, believe 'This is interesting' and go to the author's resource field by the end of the article to see what else they have to say on this subject. There, they find a link to your site promotion portable ringtones. Is the audience planning to be impressed, or interested in this? Not so likely. They would like to check out snowboarding, not personalize their phone. I believe among three things can happen then:

The audience leaves the complete site in disgust.

The reader clicks on a link to your related article.

The viewer clicks on the relevant Google AdSense (or similar contextual marketing) ad. Tour Linklicious Backlinks Genie includes new information about how to provide for it.

They do not click the author's reference link. That's a potential consumer lost, quite probably permanently.

Yes, put a link in to your website in the resource field, but many article sites let many links, so for goodness sake put a link in that' ;s linked to the article subject too, and preferably put it in first, before you lose the client. If you think you know anything, you will possibly desire to research about linklicious.me alternatives.

'But my site does not have anything regarding that subject on it'!

You can add something that does. Put an article service, and have the reference box saying 'To learn more articles on this issue, just click here.' Add a web directory, and have the text say 'To see links to web sites on this issue, click the link.' Or just head to ClickBank, search for related projects, and have a link to them, using the link saying something like 'If you prefer to find out more on this issue, obtain this product.' Preferably, not just a direct link to the merchandise, but a cloaked or redirected one.

Using this method, you still get that connect to your site that you were after actually, but, moreover, you've the chance to earn money from your audience in a fresh way. A win-win situation. Plus, you do not seem like somebody simply distributing purchased material on any subject merely for the benefit of the backlink it'll give you. Linklicious Review is a astonishing library for further concerning the inner workings of this idea. A much more professional look. Is not it worth taking the time to make greater use of one's resource box?.