A Competitive Edge

SEnuke: Ready for action

Recently, numerous the world's major project management companies took major initiatives to show government management regarding the strategic importance and benefits of project management. The emphasis would be to move from individual project management to organisational project management, which these firms keep is a strategic advantage in a competitive economy.

In this article, Ed Naughton, Director General of the Institute of Project Management and recent IPMA Vice President, asks Professor Sebastian Green, Dean of the Faculty of Commerce and Professor of Management and Marketing at University College Cork (previously of the London Business School), about his views of proper project management as an automobile for competitive advantage.

Ed: What do you issue proper Project Management is?

Prof. Green: Strategic project management is the management of the jobs which are of crucial importance to enable the operation in general to own competitive advantage.

Ed: And what defines a competitive advantage, then?

Prof. Green: You will find three characteristics of having a core competence. The three features are: it adds value to customers; it is perhaps not easily imitated; it opens up new possibilities later on.

Ed: But just how can task administration provide a competitive advantage?

Prof. Green: There are two aspects to project management. One element is the actual choice of the kind of projects that the enterprise partcipates in, and subsequently there's implementation, how the projects themselves are managed.

Ed: Competitive advantage - the value of selecting the projects - it's difficult to define which projects ought to be selected!

Prof. Green: I do believe that the choice and prioritisation of projects is something that's not been done well within-the project management literature because it is essentially been thought away through reducing it to financial analysis. The strategic imperative gives you a different way of prioritising projects because it is saying that some projects might not be as successful as others, but if they add to our expertise relative to others, then that's going to be important.

So, to take an illustration, if a company's competitive advantage is introducing services more quickly than others, drugs, let's say, getting product to market more quickly, then the projects that enable it to get the product more quickly to market will be the most important types, even if in their own terms, they don't have higher productivity than various projects.

Ed: But when we're going to select our tasks, we have to determine what are the guidelines or measurements we're going to select them against that provide the competitive advantage to us. If you have an opinion about families, you will probably choose to research about asea reviews 2017.

Prof. Green: Definitely. The enterprise must know which actions it's involved in, which are the critical ones for it competitive advantage and then, that drives the choice of projects. Firms aren't great at doing that and they might not even understand what those actions are. They will believe that it is anything they do because of the energy system.

Ed: If its strategy is formulated by a company, then what the project management community says is that project management could be the method for delivering that strategy. Then, when the business is great at doing project management, does it have any strategic advantage?

Prof. Green: Well, I suppose that comes back to this problem of the difference between the sort of projects that are chosen and the way you manage the projects. Obviously selecting the kind of projects depends upon having the ability to link and prioritise projects according to a knowledge of what the capacity of a business is in accordance with others.

Ed: Let's suppose that the method is set. In order to produce the strategy, it has to be divided, decomposed into a series of tasks. Therefore, you have to be proficient at doing project management to provide the strategy. Today, the literature says that for an operation to become great at doing jobs it's to: put in project management procedures, train people on how best to apply/do project management and co-ordinate the efforts of the people qualified to work to procedures in and built-in way using the notion of a project office. Does getting these three measures deliver a competitive advantage because of this company?

Prof. We discovered here by searching webpages. Green: Where project management, or how you control tasks, becomes a source of competitive advantage is when you can do things a lot better than others. The 'better than' is through the ability and thinking and the data which can be accumulated as time passes of managing projects. There is an event curve effect here. Two organisations will be at different points in the experience curve as to the information they've built up to handle those components of projects where the rule book is inadequate. You need management judgement and knowledge since however good the rule book is, it'll never deal completely with all the complexity of life. You have to manage down the ability curve, you've to manage the learning and knowledge that you've of these three areas of project management for this to become strategic.

Ed: Well, then, I believe there's a gap there that has to be resolved as well, in that we have now produced a competency at doing project management to do projects, but we have not aligned that competency to the selection of projects which will help us to give this competitive edge. Is project management capable of being copied?

Prof. Green: Not the softer aspects and not the develop-ment of tacit understanding of having run many, many projects over time. So, for instance, you, Ed, do have more knowledge of how-to work tasks than others. That is why people came to you, since while you both might have a standard book such as the PMBoK or the ICB, you've developed more experiential knowledge around it.

Essentially, it can be imitated a quantity of just how, although not when you arrange the softer tacit knowledge of knowledge into it.

Ed: Organisational project management maturity styles are a hot topic at the moment and are closely linked to the 'knowledge curve' effect you mentioned ear-lier - how should we see them?

Prof. Green: in my opinion in moving beyond painting by numbers, moving beyond the idea that that is all you need to do and you may enforce this pair of capabilities and techniques and text book standards and an enterprise is wholly plastic. You might say, exactly the same difficulty was experienced by the builders of the ability curve. If you show organizations the experience curve on cost, it is almost like, for every doubling of volume, cost reductions occur without you needing to do such a thing. What we realize is nevertheless, the experience curve is a potential of a possibility. Their' realisation is dependent upon the ability of professionals.

Ed: Are senior executives/chief executives in-the mind-set to understand the potential advantages of project management?

Prof. Green: Until recently, project management has offered itself in technical terms. Then it'd be more appealing to senior executives, if it was promoted in terms of the integration at general management, at the power to manage over the characteristics lending approach methods with judgement. If you think you know anything at all, you will certainly fancy to study about find out more. So, it's about the ability that produces project management so powerful, the practices using the sense and the blending of the soft and the difficult. If senior executives do not grasp it at the moment, it's maybe not because they're wrong. It's because project management has not sold it self as effectively as it should've done.

Ed: Do we need to offer to senior executives and chief executives that it will provide competitive advantage for them?

Prof. Green: No, I do believe we have to show them how it does it. We have to go inside and actually show them how they are able to use it, not just with regards to providing jobs on time and within cost. We must demonstrate to them how they can use it to overcome organisational resistance to change, how they can use it to enhance capabilities and activities that lead to competitive edge, how they can use it to enhance the tacit knowledge in the enterprise. There is a complete range of ways they could utilize it. They have to observe that the evidence of the results surpasses just how they are currently doing it.. This fine www manatech com web page has uncountable tasteful tips for the meaning behind it.