ODF and differences of opinion | TalkBack on ZDNet about the OpenDocument Foun... - The Diigo Meta page

• 04 Nov 07
  

  Gary Edwards

  The Foundation principles set the record straight, explaining the Foundation's five year role at the core of OASIS ODF development, and our decision to consider the W3C CDF (XHTML+CDF) as a highly interoperable web ready format. This discussion answers the false allegations of artful fairy tale spinners Rob Weir and Andy Updegrove. Neither of which had anything to do with ISO 26300 (ODF 1.0).

  cdf odf ooxml w3c

  • Just because we are garage challenged doesn't mean we can't find the back door to the big house :)

      

    The larger issue at stake here is not whether or not we have a garage, or what our contribution to ODF has been over the course of five years as active members of OASIS ODF. What it really comes down to is the implementation of ODF in the real world.

Page Comments

• 
  Gary Edwards on 2007-11-04
  Lengthy comment explaining once again why we moved from ODF to CDF. 
  

Would you like to comment?

Join Diigo for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.