Sportsmen and Steroids: Their Laying and You're Buying That

Athletes are lying to us. They are lying and we believe their is. Well, the majority of us do. The thing is, many Athletes that test positive for restricted substances are blaming nutritional supplements since the cause for the positive test. Enables examine the following assertion from Iowa State linebacker Matt Robertson who was recently kicked off the Iowa state football team for testing positive for a banned substance.

"I take full responsibility for taking an over-the-counter supplement that is banned by the NCAA, " Robertson said in a statement released Monday. "I feel paying a heavy price for a really bad decision, as I can never again wear an Iowa Express uniform. I hope my example will serve as a warning to others contemplating use of dietary supplements. "

Statements like these are leading to an unnecessary hysteria between the general public regarding dietary supplements. In Mr. Robertson's quote, specifically notice the Stanozolol Cycle term "dietary supplements". Health supplement is a very broad term, it addresses literally thousands of different types of products. Right now there is merely one kind of dietary supplement that will cause a positive result for steroid tests. These products are called pro-hormones. Did a pro-hormone cause Mr. Robertson's positive result? Possibly, but we will never know the truth.

Pro-hormones are being used to raise the system's testosterone levels, just like steroids, but at a much lesser effect. Any kind of athlete who needs a pro-hormone knows what it will. They know that pro-hormones are designed to elevate testosterone producing it more muscular mass and greater athletic performance. About top of that, pro-hormones say directly on the container something to the impact of "Professional and beginner athletes subject to performance boosting substance testing should talk to with their sanctioning body before using this product as use of such could cause a reactive drug test. " Quite clear isn't it? A person can't tell me that Mr. Robertson can't read, he is "an academics all-Big 12 performer who was as good in the classroom as he was on the field, inch according to his trainer Dan McCarney.

Blaming a positive test on one of those products may be true because they can cause a positive on a steroid test. However, it would also be very easy to blame a positive test on a dietary health supplement when they athlete was actually by using a steroid. Because the actual supplements are seldom made public, it is simple to blame a good test on a dietary supplement.

It doesn't make a difference because a positive test is a positive test, right? Wrong. By these athletes blaming their positive test on dietary supplements rather than steroids they are in effect "passing the buck" That is, they are claiming ignorance, rather than taking responsibility, and they are hurting the multi-billion dollar dietary supplement industry in the process. This is not ok, not only because it creates false beliefs among the list of public about supplements, but additionally because it gives the federal government reasons to further restrict what you can buy without a prescription.

Would you like to have to go to your doctor to get a prescription for a multi-vitamin? What happens if you desired to buy a protein supplement? Would you want to have to visit your doctor for that? I didn't think so. These types of athletes and their organizations are being extremely irresponsible by using broad conditions like dietary supplements when describing positive drug assessments.

The NCAA and other governing organizations should need to reveal what exact substance these athletes are tests positive for. By not doing so these organizations are allowing athletes to save face at the expense of an entire multi-billion buck industry. By forcing the NCAA and other governing bodies to name the particular substance that was analyzed positive for they would eliminate all confusion on what is and it is not the cause of positive tests. Either that or governing bodies including the NCAA and the press should be educated in the proper terminology of the dietary supplement industry. Painting reactive tests with the term "dietary supplements" is inaccurate, unfair and irresponsible.

Take for example Rafael Palmeiro, everyone recalls his overly compelling capital hill testimony. How satrical that only a few weeks later Rafael tested positive for Stanozolol, a steroid. Palmeiro tried hard to complete the blame. He held responsible "tainted" dietary supplements, and when that didn't fly he blamed a nutritional B12 shot. Well stanozol is a very specific and popular steroid. Right now there is no possible way that a positive for stanazolol can be from health supplements or B12. Following people started realizing this, Palmeiro started claiming lack of knowledge, saying that he never knowingly took steroids. Well I guess Rafael will be making a good dwelling after baseball considering this individual is the only person in the world that knows where to find pills that jump off the stand into your mouth on their own. What a cool idea, the little blue pill could be come the little blue leaping pill. That would be neat to see.