from web site
DOWNLOAD: http://urllio.com/qyot9

DOWNLOAD: http://urllio.com/qyot9
Following the American invasion of Iraq in 2003 Chief Warrant Officer Roy Miller and his men are charged with finding the so-called weapons of mass destruction, whose existence justified American involvement, according to the Pentagon and their man in Baghdad, Poundstone. Veteran CIA operative Marty tells Miller that there are no weapons, it is a deception to allow the Americans to take over the country and install a puppet leader. Also suspicious of Poundstone is Wall Street Journal reporter Lawrie Dayne, who lets slip to Miller that Poundstone told her he had secret talks in Jordan with an important Iraqi, code-named Magellan, who told him about the weapons, though it now seems likely Magellan's true information was to the contrary. So begins a hunt for the truth. Who's playing whom?
Discovering covert and faulty intelligence causes a U.S. Army officer to go rogue as he hunts for Weapons of Mass Destruction in an unstable region.
THUMBS DOWN, BUT......
I was not in a good mood. After seeing this movie again, I will say my first movie reviews were bad....
Amend..(see last line)
Now, after a second viewing. I Give it a THUMBS UP, I will give this movie a small THUMBS UP
I really thought this was a pretty good movie by concept, but the movie premise was like a really wobbly old typical style, GOVERNMENT conspiracy theories, like the old bad pollinations, lawyers, Congressmen, Law makers, judges that are criminals and the thugs that feed and live on that. We have have all heard this before.........
ENOUGH
This is what brought this country down... The HISTORY and of course of Hollywood is one of the the very biggest reasons this has happed, the people in power(that RULE)and the public that watch TV, oblivious to the path this country is going on, is on the way DOWN...
Who are the bad guy?
You chose. Chairman Moe Adolf Hitler Time Mag, MNBC, CNN, ABC, CBS, FOX, Vladimir Propp, Maria Tatar, 1968 Review of Star Trek the series. Donald Trump, the Wall-street Journalist, time magazine,,,, Who is bad???
Maybe people like: Glenn Beck, Pat Gray (and friend of G's-#1Stu), Rush Limbaugh, Kim Komando, Dave Ramsey, Neal Boortz, Clark Howard, Erick Erickson, Ayn Rand (read history, really), Erick Erickson, Top of the list next to Glen is...... One of my favorites,(P or S, you'll never guess who)
ARE THESE PEOPLE THAT SAVE US, I DON'T THINK SO... How do we Know, for sure..
Green Zone has been promoted by Universal Studios with its plot mostly obscured, wrapped around the mysterious figure "Magellan". Watching the trailer, one only gets a vague sense that the film it set in Iraq and that Matt Damon's character, Roy Miller, is searching for Weapons of Mass Destruction in 2003. It looks, perhaps appropriately, like a close cousin to the Bourne movies, of which Paul Greengrass was also director.
It's not a bad move, since it is a lightning-quick movie in its editing and camera-work (though nowhere near as much as the adrenaline-overloaded 'Ultimatum'), but the film is more akin to Greengrass' United 93. Both films, that one about the fourth plane hijacked on 9/11 that crashed in Pennsylvania, and this one about the whole reason the US went to war, take the viewer back to a point that is fresh in our collective memory- maybe too soon some would say, others not soon enough- when chaos was fully erupting, for a few hours or within grasp of a Pentagon phone call.
It's not the most light of touches Greengrass takes to the material in terms of the script. The screenplay he has to work with by Brian Hegeland takes some fictional liberties with what are factual cases: the US did take advice from an unreliable source (or rather the US listened to what they wanted to hear), they kept coming up empty-handed after already months of inspecting before the invasion, and they're still told to dig despite the futility. This is all fine, though I wonder if the film would have benefited from just a little more characterization, aside from the types and casting to them (Damon as the determined hero, Kinnear as the clean-cut but sleazy bureaucratic villain, Gleeson as the helpful CIA character, Ryan as the frustrated embedded journalist), and sometimes spelling out too clearly the points of history.
And yet it's hard to begrudge a film with so much else going on as well. What makes Green Zone powerful is Greengrass' visceral approach to the material, again more akin to United 93 than the Bourne movies. We're wrapped up in each step of the story, like a mystery infused with the purpose and drive of the hand-held camera (done by someone who knows well, Barry Akroyd of the Hurt Locker), and we want to see where it goes. There aren't too many big surprises in the story, despite its slight liberties, since it's always seemingly realistic in its scope of cinematography and technique. When Roy Miller's team does a daytime raid of a place with a suspected Sadaam general, the tension is thick and the payoff is juicy and satisfying. That there turns out to be ambiguity in Miller's situation (the line "Don't be naive" is repeated but necessary) gives some added urgency to Greengrass' direction.
If you're one of the few people on planet Earth who still are not sure whether there were WMD's in Iraq (and you're probably Dick Cheney if you're one of them), then obviously the film isn't for you. It would seems like a given now, that it was one of those blatant lies that people were told to get over as the US would be there to stay in Iraq for an indeterminable amount of time (this despite the Mission Accomplished stunt, shown here in Green Zone again punctuating the story like a sudden exclamation point). But if Green Zone does approach this material a little thick, it's still in service of the long run historically, and comes second after being an entertaining action-mystery. People years from now can look at Green Zone first as a suspense film, a war film shot rigorously and with its black-white-gray areas surely defined, and then as a history lesson. It's an imperfect but important film for our times.
It's also rather tawdry. The climax is as ludicrous as any Jack Bauer adventure, and Greengrass is always on shaky ground. Literally.
Yes, Allied forces recovered thousands aerial bombs and artillery shells filled with nerve gas of the same type used by Saddam in the Iran/Iraq war and to kill over 3000 people in the Kurdish town of Halabaja in 1988. However the manufacturing system that produced them had long since been abandoned as a result of UN sanctions, Iraqi exiles fleeing the regime telling Western intelligence agencies that they were still functioning in order to convince them to liberate Iraq from Saddam's dictatorship. In interviews before his trial Saddam stated that he obstructed UN inspectors who could verify the truth so as not to lose face and expose Iraq's military weakness to Iran, thinking that any Allied campaign would be limited to airstrikes. No, Saddam was a worldwide sponsor of terrorism supporting movements such as Islamic Jihad and others and it is know that his agents met those of Osama Bin Laden for talks but there is no evidence that he provided any actual support. In interviews prior to his trial Saddam dismissed Bin Laden as a 'zealot' who would encourage Islamic extremism in largely secular Iraq. a5c7b9f00b
The Mask song free download
Pay movie hindi free download
Devil Hunter Yohko full movie hindi download
American Ninja Warrior full movie hd download
National Security full movie in hindi free download mp4
Ten Meter Tower telugu full movie download
Bats Jokes full movie in hindi free download mp4
And the Winner Is online free
the Water Rats full movie download in hindi
\ full movie in hindi free download mp4