Samsung Galaxy A50 Camera Review
from web site
Launched in February 2019, the Galaxy A50 is a function-wealthy, funds smartphone that features a big 6.4-inch AMOLED FHD+ show with a small waterdrop notch and a thin chin, thus offering plenty of screen actual property. With an Exynos 9610 chipset running Android 9.0, the Galaxy A50 is one of the vital powerful units at this end of the market. The photography proposition presents not one, but three cameras on the rear of the system: a 25Mp sensor coupled to a 26mm f/1.7 lens for the primary camera, an 8Mp extremely-wide camera, and a 5Mp depth-sensing sensor for bokeh shots. Read on to find out how the Samsung Galaxy A50 digicam performs towards the competitors in our in-depth overview.
https://samsunggalaxyexpertsbrisbane.home.blog/2019/06/24/samsung-a-series-phones-in-australia-a20-a30-a50-and-a70/ :
- Triple-camera setup - Primary: 25Mp sensor with 26mm-equivalent f/1.7 lens - Ultra-broad: 8Mp sensor with 13mm-equal f/2.2 lens - 5Mp depth-sensing sensor with f/2.2 lens PDAF autofocus - LED flash - 1080p/30fps video
About DxOMark Mobile tests: For scoring and analysis in our smartphone camera opinions, DxOMark engineers seize and evaluate over 1500 test pictures and greater than 2 hours of video each in managed lab environments and in natural indoor and outside scenes, utilizing the camera’s default settings. This text is designed to spotlight an important outcomes of our testing. For more info concerning the DxOMark Mobile test protocol, click right here. More particulars on how we rating smartphone cameras can be found right here.
Test abstract
Achieving an total DxOMark Mobile rating of 83 points, the Samsung Galaxy A50 doesn't rank on the very prime of our database of smartphone image high quality, but is barely three points behind final year’s Galaxy A9. The A50’s performance is also on par with a lot older flagship devices, such because the Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge (82 factors) and the Apple iPhone 7 (eighty five points).
Securing a photograph score of eighty five factors, the A50 does properly for stills, significantly in bright sunny situations, with good exposures, good coloration rendering, and customarily correct white balance ensuring pleasant pictures.
Shooting in tricky high-contrast conditions, the A50 presents vast dynamic vary, with effective HDR rendering guaranteeing nicely-preserved detail in both the spotlight and shadow regions in our “under the bridge” test scene. Actually, the shadow recovery in a few of the A50’s HDR photographs supplied a slight enchancment over the more expensive competitors. Although a little bit chromatic noise, as well as ringing and aliasing edge artifacts are visible at shut inspection, the A50 does a superb job on HDR shots overall.
Portrait mode is another optimistic side for the A50, thanks to the devoted depth-sensing sensor’s reasonably correct depth estimation and subject masking when applying background blur to portraits. It’s not excellent, with some edge artifacts and abrupt transitions within the blur gradient visible when examining photographs at giant scale. These are much less apparent when viewing photos on the device’s show, nevertheless, and the A50 did a greater job of isolating advanced details such as the glasses in our test portrait compared to the Samsung Galaxy A9 or LG G8. The A50 applies a nice circular form to background spotlights, too, and though bokeh photographs can lack just a little contrast, with barely washed-out shade, the overall effect remains generally nice.
The primary areas for enchancment are low ranges of detail preservation in all situations and particularly with zoom pictures, as well as disappointing leads to cloudy outside scenes and decrease mild conditions generally. We observed several failures in overcast out of doors conditions, including a reasonably sturdy greenish colour solid and a heavier build-up of luminance noise in flat areas, with decrease ranges of detail in intricate areas than we’d count on to see in out of doors images. The truth is, element preservation is likely one of the A50’s major weaknesses, with wonderful localized detail rarely rendered properly in any lighting situations.
Choosing an extremely-wide-angle second digital camera on the A50 may show in style with these photographers trying to squeeze more into the body, however it additionally means there’s no tele-lens for improved zoom pictures. Consequently, while the A50 affords a digital zoom answer as much as a most 4x magnification, the results are some methods off the pace of what you can expect from the good performers. Even at shut range (approximately 2x magnification), a significant lack of detail is visible, with unnatural rendering typically evident in intricate areas. At medium range (roughly 4x magnification), different points similar to ringing and denoising artifacts, a heavy build-up of noise, and poor shade rendering additional scale back the standard of the A50’s zoom shots.
Flash performance is a energy for the A50, and though goal exposures are a little high for each flash-only and blended lighting pictures, they remain acceptable and ensure good bright results. Corner shading is reasonably well-managed, too, however there may be a powerful difference in the extent of noise between the center and corners of the frame in flash photographs wherein the edges have been brightened by picture processing. Some luminance noise can be seen on faces in the center of the body, however it is handled better there than in the corners. White balance is pretty impartial in flash photographs, too, and although some slight desaturation is obvious in flash-solely photographs, total color rendering remains acceptable.
Our testers also found some image artifacts. Essentially the most problematic is ghosting, where subjects with even moderate movement often seem with a double image. We also found some ringing, flare, noisy edges, and geometric shifts the place lines and patterns don’t quite line up in a few of our pattern pictures.
Tested under controlled conditions in the lab, the A50’s PDAF autofocus system carried out effectively, persistently delivering in-focus photographs. It’s not the quickest we’ve examined, however its response instances of round 100ms in our outdoor (one thousand lux) photographs and indoor (300 lux) pictures are nicely inside acceptable limits. It was slower in low mild (20 lux), often taking around 500ms (0.5 second) for the focus to lock on, which can make it a little bit extra difficult to shortly seize a properly-focused shot when the sunshine is poor.
The A50 achieves a Video score of seventy nine points. Its predominant strengths for motion pictures are nice colour with generally accurate white balance, and effectively-controlled noise in both outside and indoor lighting conditions—although each color and noise control deteriorate noticeably in very low gentle. Noise is especially effectively-managed in flat areas of uniform color, where a seen build-up of luminance noise is commonly distracting in smartphone movies. On the A50, a coarse noise becomes visible only in low-light movies.
Target exposures are typically accurate and pleasant within the A50’s videos, too, so once more, it’s solely in low-gentle conditions between 1 and 20 lux where severe below-exposure becomes obvious. We noticed some publicity instabilities in all circumstances, nonetheless, and dynamic range is very restricted, so you’d be greatest off seeking extra balanced lighting conditions when taking pictures video.
The principle areas for improvement with video concern autofocus, element, and stabilization. Autofocus instabilities are widespread, with frequent and unnecessary refocusing easily triggered by small changes in the scene, and autofocus monitoring is relatively poor in all lighting circumstances. The A50’s stabilization system is pretty efficient for static handheld videos and with average panning movements, but recording while walking leads to robust judders and residual excessive-frequency motion with every step. Detail is also low usually, with visible variations in the sharpness between frames; and obvious artifacts affect the integrity of videos particularly indoors and in low mild.
Conclusion
Packing a large 6.4-inch AMOLED show, the Exynos 9610 chipset, and a triple-camera setup, the Samsung Galaxy A50 has plenty for the funds-conscious smartphone enthusiast to get excited about. Under the rigors of our rear-camera testing, nonetheless, the A50 can’t match the performance of a few of one of the best mid-vary gadgets and definitely not the image high quality of the latest flagship offerings. It’s greatest in brilliant sunny conditions, the place publicity, dynamic range, and colour are good, and bokeh shots are very acceptable. In cloudy or low-mild circumstances, although, it’s not quite as efficient with stills or video, and we found zoom photographs to be a specific weakness.
https://samsunggalaxyexpertsbrisbane.home.blog/2019/06/24/samsung-a-series-phones-in-australia-a20-a30-a50-and-a70/ :
- Triple-camera setup - Primary: 25Mp sensor with 26mm-equivalent f/1.7 lens - Ultra-broad: 8Mp sensor with 13mm-equal f/2.2 lens - 5Mp depth-sensing sensor with f/2.2 lens PDAF autofocus - LED flash - 1080p/30fps video
About DxOMark Mobile tests: For scoring and analysis in our smartphone camera opinions, DxOMark engineers seize and evaluate over 1500 test pictures and greater than 2 hours of video each in managed lab environments and in natural indoor and outside scenes, utilizing the camera’s default settings. This text is designed to spotlight an important outcomes of our testing. For more info concerning the DxOMark Mobile test protocol, click right here. More particulars on how we rating smartphone cameras can be found right here.
Test abstract
Achieving an total DxOMark Mobile rating of 83 points, the Samsung Galaxy A50 doesn't rank on the very prime of our database of smartphone image high quality, but is barely three points behind final year’s Galaxy A9. The A50’s performance is also on par with a lot older flagship devices, such because the Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge (82 factors) and the Apple iPhone 7 (eighty five points).
Securing a photograph score of eighty five factors, the A50 does properly for stills, significantly in bright sunny situations, with good exposures, good coloration rendering, and customarily correct white balance ensuring pleasant pictures.
Shooting in tricky high-contrast conditions, the A50 presents vast dynamic vary, with effective HDR rendering guaranteeing nicely-preserved detail in both the spotlight and shadow regions in our “under the bridge” test scene. Actually, the shadow recovery in a few of the A50’s HDR photographs supplied a slight enchancment over the more expensive competitors. Although a little bit chromatic noise, as well as ringing and aliasing edge artifacts are visible at shut inspection, the A50 does a superb job on HDR shots overall.
Portrait mode is another optimistic side for the A50, thanks to the devoted depth-sensing sensor’s reasonably correct depth estimation and subject masking when applying background blur to portraits. It’s not excellent, with some edge artifacts and abrupt transitions within the blur gradient visible when examining photographs at giant scale. These are much less apparent when viewing photos on the device’s show, nevertheless, and the A50 did a greater job of isolating advanced details such as the glasses in our test portrait compared to the Samsung Galaxy A9 or LG G8. The A50 applies a nice circular form to background spotlights, too, and though bokeh photographs can lack just a little contrast, with barely washed-out shade, the overall effect remains generally nice.
The primary areas for enchancment are low ranges of detail preservation in all situations and particularly with zoom pictures, as well as disappointing leads to cloudy outside scenes and decrease mild conditions generally. We observed several failures in overcast out of doors conditions, including a reasonably sturdy greenish colour solid and a heavier build-up of luminance noise in flat areas, with decrease ranges of detail in intricate areas than we’d count on to see in out of doors images. The truth is, element preservation is likely one of the A50’s major weaknesses, with wonderful localized detail rarely rendered properly in any lighting situations.
Choosing an extremely-wide-angle second digital camera on the A50 may show in style with these photographers trying to squeeze more into the body, however it additionally means there’s no tele-lens for improved zoom pictures. Consequently, while the A50 affords a digital zoom answer as much as a most 4x magnification, the results are some methods off the pace of what you can expect from the good performers. Even at shut range (approximately 2x magnification), a significant lack of detail is visible, with unnatural rendering typically evident in intricate areas. At medium range (roughly 4x magnification), different points similar to ringing and denoising artifacts, a heavy build-up of noise, and poor shade rendering additional scale back the standard of the A50’s zoom shots.
Flash performance is a energy for the A50, and though goal exposures are a little high for each flash-only and blended lighting pictures, they remain acceptable and ensure good bright results. Corner shading is reasonably well-managed, too, however there may be a powerful difference in the extent of noise between the center and corners of the frame in flash photographs wherein the edges have been brightened by picture processing. Some luminance noise can be seen on faces in the center of the body, however it is handled better there than in the corners. White balance is pretty impartial in flash photographs, too, and although some slight desaturation is obvious in flash-solely photographs, total color rendering remains acceptable.
Our testers also found some image artifacts. Essentially the most problematic is ghosting, where subjects with even moderate movement often seem with a double image. We also found some ringing, flare, noisy edges, and geometric shifts the place lines and patterns don’t quite line up in a few of our pattern pictures.
Tested under controlled conditions in the lab, the A50’s PDAF autofocus system carried out effectively, persistently delivering in-focus photographs. It’s not the quickest we’ve examined, however its response instances of round 100ms in our outdoor (one thousand lux) photographs and indoor (300 lux) pictures are nicely inside acceptable limits. It was slower in low mild (20 lux), often taking around 500ms (0.5 second) for the focus to lock on, which can make it a little bit extra difficult to shortly seize a properly-focused shot when the sunshine is poor.
The A50 achieves a Video score of seventy nine points. Its predominant strengths for motion pictures are nice colour with generally accurate white balance, and effectively-controlled noise in both outside and indoor lighting conditions—although each color and noise control deteriorate noticeably in very low gentle. Noise is especially effectively-managed in flat areas of uniform color, where a seen build-up of luminance noise is commonly distracting in smartphone movies. On the A50, a coarse noise becomes visible only in low-light movies.
Target exposures are typically accurate and pleasant within the A50’s videos, too, so once more, it’s solely in low-gentle conditions between 1 and 20 lux where severe below-exposure becomes obvious. We noticed some publicity instabilities in all circumstances, nonetheless, and dynamic range is very restricted, so you’d be greatest off seeking extra balanced lighting conditions when taking pictures video.
The principle areas for improvement with video concern autofocus, element, and stabilization. Autofocus instabilities are widespread, with frequent and unnecessary refocusing easily triggered by small changes in the scene, and autofocus monitoring is relatively poor in all lighting circumstances. The A50’s stabilization system is pretty efficient for static handheld videos and with average panning movements, but recording while walking leads to robust judders and residual excessive-frequency motion with every step. Detail is also low usually, with visible variations in the sharpness between frames; and obvious artifacts affect the integrity of videos particularly indoors and in low mild.
Conclusion
Packing a large 6.4-inch AMOLED show, the Exynos 9610 chipset, and a triple-camera setup, the Samsung Galaxy A50 has plenty for the funds-conscious smartphone enthusiast to get excited about. Under the rigors of our rear-camera testing, nonetheless, the A50 can’t match the performance of a few of one of the best mid-vary gadgets and definitely not the image high quality of the latest flagship offerings. It’s greatest in brilliant sunny conditions, the place publicity, dynamic range, and colour are good, and bokeh shots are very acceptable. In cloudy or low-mild circumstances, although, it’s not quite as efficient with stills or video, and we found zoom photographs to be a specific weakness.
