/ yfrompreston9's Library/ Notes/ I'm more prone to self-censor. Once I worked for a children' humor magazine, more than 25 years ago, they censored some artwork, but it wasn't sexual content. They misinterpreted it as bad in other ways too stupid to get into. But I Have been really bless
I'm more prone to self-censor. Once I worked for a children' humor magazine, more than 25 years ago, they censored some artwork, but it wasn't sexual content. They misinterpreted it as bad in other ways too stupid to get into. But I Have been really bless
from web site
Your illustrations often depict nudity. What exactly is it about the bare form which makes you draw it so often?
I probably do thus less than I used to, because my pornography work apart, I generally comprise nudity when it's germane to what's happening. But https://s3.amazonaws.com/y-naturist/nude-beach-party.html is simply interesting. The human body is fun to draw.
Given the American sensitivity toward nudity, does this impact your work and what you put into your books or what you publish? Or how or where you publish it?
Yes. In my own forthcoming novel, MAXIMUM MINIMUM WAGE(out Spring 2013 from Image Comics), I went in and actually toned down some of the more overt, or arguably gratuitous, nudity in hopes of reaching a bigger audience and not scaring away some more conservative retailers. So, yeah, it's a matter you have to think of. I've a prose novel I Have needed to write set in Hell, and the cursed souls are nude inside it. My representative actually supported me to tone down the nudity in a publication that was only text. I chose not to because that is taking it too far. Additionally , I tabled the novel for now, but for other reasons. But America is fairly strange about sex and nudity. It is a society obsessed with the prurient but completely at odds with its own nature.
Well now we have to ask.
https://s3.amazonaws.com/y-naturist/family-nudists-pics.html is more humorous, female is more enjoyable.
Do you think anything should be censored? And where does one draw the line?
Yes. This really is getting a bit dark, but anything involving children. But even there I suppose context is everything. If you just described some of the items they have truly depicted on South Park you might balk. But they are able to get away with some pretty unsuitable things because they're masters at weighing the scale completely on the humor. I draw the line occasionally taking into consideration the market. But in spite of what many people might believe, I've just normally calmed down on certain issues. On the other hand, I did tone down Pariah. My first draft got considerably darker and more awful in specific pictures and I pared that back to help it become more palatable. Occasionally too much is too much, you know?
Do you feel torn about the self censorship?
Not actually. There's a time and a location. If the nudity is a distraction and does not function the story it perhaps doesn't need to be there. But there's something to be said for alternate versions, certainly. I enjoy that kind of thing. It's having your cake and eating it naked.
Would you believe non-sexual nudity should be censored?
It's all about context. I love to depict nudity, but there is a time and a location. So, there's no hard, firm, answer for that.
What do you think of the Nipplegate episode as well as the recent instance of an Austrian museum censoring its promotional art poster of naked guys? Can you believe this type of censorship has become more common? Is that satisfactory?
https://s3.amazonaws.com/y-naturist/family-nudism-photos.html is moronic. And that's a magazine ostensibly for kids. So the fact that anyone was fussed over dots in the New Yorker is absolutely stupid. And the redrawn version makes no sense in the slightest. If they were covering them at the genuine exhibition that would be another issue.
There are other bare art posters plastered all over Vienna, except they feature full frontal female nudes. These were perfectly acceptable, while the male nudes caused a big uproar. Any ideas on this or why there was such a difference in reaction to them? Should only certain types of nudity be censored in public?
Okay, this points out several things. Some would argue that it is because female genitalia is internal (although these days, with some many women completely waxed, one could argue you are able to see plenty of the close human body), while men's bits are fully on show. I believe it basically comes down to many (most?) people finds members kind of gross. Or preposterous. Or both. What do I understand?
So there you've got it. The low-down from two cartoonists and how they cope with nudity taboo, female nipple bulge and censorship.
What do you readers think? Is nudity censorship getting away from control these days? Or do cartoonists still get away with a lot more because it is a cartoon?
Social Nudityand Censorship Blogs ByFelicity Jones For -Young Naturists And Naturists America FKK
Tags: breasts, censorship, genitals, porn, topless / topfree
Class: Felicity's Naturist Site, Naked Censorship and Censoring Of Online Nudity, Naked News, Social Activism, Social Nudity BlogsGetting Naked in NYC & Body Painting with Andy Golub
I probably do thus less than I used to, because my pornography work apart, I generally comprise nudity when it's germane to what's happening. But https://s3.amazonaws.com/y-naturist/nude-beach-party.html is simply interesting. The human body is fun to draw.
Given the American sensitivity toward nudity, does this impact your work and what you put into your books or what you publish? Or how or where you publish it?
Yes. In my own forthcoming novel, MAXIMUM MINIMUM WAGE(out Spring 2013 from Image Comics), I went in and actually toned down some of the more overt, or arguably gratuitous, nudity in hopes of reaching a bigger audience and not scaring away some more conservative retailers. So, yeah, it's a matter you have to think of. I've a prose novel I Have needed to write set in Hell, and the cursed souls are nude inside it. My representative actually supported me to tone down the nudity in a publication that was only text. I chose not to because that is taking it too far. Additionally , I tabled the novel for now, but for other reasons. But America is fairly strange about sex and nudity. It is a society obsessed with the prurient but completely at odds with its own nature.
Well now we have to ask.
https://s3.amazonaws.com/y-naturist/family-nudists-pics.html is more humorous, female is more enjoyable.
Do you think anything should be censored? And where does one draw the line?
Yes. This really is getting a bit dark, but anything involving children. But even there I suppose context is everything. If you just described some of the items they have truly depicted on South Park you might balk. But they are able to get away with some pretty unsuitable things because they're masters at weighing the scale completely on the humor. I draw the line occasionally taking into consideration the market. But in spite of what many people might believe, I've just normally calmed down on certain issues. On the other hand, I did tone down Pariah. My first draft got considerably darker and more awful in specific pictures and I pared that back to help it become more palatable. Occasionally too much is too much, you know?
Do you feel torn about the self censorship?
Not actually. There's a time and a location. If the nudity is a distraction and does not function the story it perhaps doesn't need to be there. But there's something to be said for alternate versions, certainly. I enjoy that kind of thing. It's having your cake and eating it naked.
Would you believe non-sexual nudity should be censored?
It's all about context. I love to depict nudity, but there is a time and a location. So, there's no hard, firm, answer for that.
What do you think of the Nipplegate episode as well as the recent instance of an Austrian museum censoring its promotional art poster of naked guys? Can you believe this type of censorship has become more common? Is that satisfactory?
https://s3.amazonaws.com/y-naturist/family-nudism-photos.html is moronic. And that's a magazine ostensibly for kids. So the fact that anyone was fussed over dots in the New Yorker is absolutely stupid. And the redrawn version makes no sense in the slightest. If they were covering them at the genuine exhibition that would be another issue.
There are other bare art posters plastered all over Vienna, except they feature full frontal female nudes. These were perfectly acceptable, while the male nudes caused a big uproar. Any ideas on this or why there was such a difference in reaction to them? Should only certain types of nudity be censored in public?
Okay, this points out several things. Some would argue that it is because female genitalia is internal (although these days, with some many women completely waxed, one could argue you are able to see plenty of the close human body), while men's bits are fully on show. I believe it basically comes down to many (most?) people finds members kind of gross. Or preposterous. Or both. What do I understand?
So there you've got it. The low-down from two cartoonists and how they cope with nudity taboo, female nipple bulge and censorship.
What do you readers think? Is nudity censorship getting away from control these days? Or do cartoonists still get away with a lot more because it is a cartoon?
Social Nudityand Censorship Blogs ByFelicity Jones For -Young Naturists And Naturists America FKK
Tags: breasts, censorship, genitals, porn, topless / topfree
Class: Felicity's Naturist Site, Naked Censorship and Censoring Of Online Nudity, Naked News, Social Activism, Social Nudity BlogsGetting Naked in NYC & Body Painting with Andy Golub
