what's webhard?
from web site
down site
Compared to the following clouds, media playback in mobile environments is advantageous. Especially in the case of videos, the next cloud has to be downloaded all together, while streaming. Merely to stream! I need to install another app again. Cloud alone isn't enough to stream.
Faster compared to the next cloud. About 20%.
Once you open a document with a cloud viewer, it breaks significantly less than another cloud (but breaking itself is already a problem).
Web app is supported. It's rudimentary, but it is possible to write. However, the problem is that the document format is really a bizarre format, such as .ndoc, which makes it extremely incompatible.
File sharing through the URL (but this is as far as another cloud is concerned).
Webhard
It includes a smaller capacity when compared to next cloud.
In comparison to foreign cloud services, it boasts poor service quality.
Compared to the next cloud, it is extremely disadvantageous for music playback. Continuous streaming is possible only for several selected sound sources. Another cloud only should be in a folder.
You should share a URL and that means you can't share music files or videos.
According to the report, you will find a saying that N drive appears like a local drive when installed, but only it happens like a local drive, which is no different from the folder synchronization setting. It's a whole lot worse for computers to begin with when external programs play tricks in it. It's much better to just clean up the synchronization folder.***
It is very specialized in playing music. In particular, it's the only cloud that can play sound sources in an environment much like MP3 players we are acquainted with. Although each song has some buffering, it appears to play around 192kpbs continuously, assuming that communication is in good condition in a 3G environment. Needless to say, in reality, it's often cut off at that point)
It includes a large capacity. This can be a significant advantage when considering domestic cloud services as a whole, which have poor quality of media access in cloud services.
You can substitute the finish drive above. In particular, if a picture is within a document, it really is rarely opened properly.
Streaming songs often cuts off (but not often) due to communication issues with the cloud, not Internet speed problems. Personally i think like it's about once every two hours. And when you listen to high-quality sound sources, it gets buffered often, or if you are in a place where the 3G environment isn't smooth, it gets cut off more often. And when it's in that state, you must discover the path of the folder where in fact the song was playing and play it again.
The only way to share is folder sharing. Only some documents or presentation files are available for file viewing. Aside from those points, you'll find nothing to say even if it really is almost a webhard level.
Foreign Cloud Comparison (Google Drive, Dropbox, Box, Skydrive)
Google Drive
It exerts tremendous power in writing documents. In particular, even without an office program, Google Drive can cover it somewhat. Not fancy ppts or fancy excels, nearly every simple document is OK.
It is beneficial to reflect the progress of work in the mobile environment. By establishing only offline views, the files you focus on can continue being reflected in the cloud instantly. This can be a very convenient feature for sharing files with other users.
It is easy to interact with other Google services such as Gmail.
Unless you upload documents right to the Google drive but write them on the Google drive web app, the capability of the file does not take into account cloud storage (what do you mean, if you just utilize the web app, the capacity of the Google drive is infinite).
Now, photo media access is strong at the dropbox level. It is possible to flip through photos and videos could be played right away. However, the loading time appears to take a little longer compared to the dropbox. I feel it), but it doesn't bother me.
There are probably the most apps that can be connected. In a desktop environment. Various connection apps allow various operations in the net environment without installing programs on the computer. It's a bit of a problem that the app doesn't connect at all on mobile, but it is the best in the desktop environment.
Upload a small pdf file and change it out to Google Docs format. It could then be stored again in MS Word format or something. However, it really is only possible with pdf files of 2MB or less.
There is no bandwidth restriction in name. There's a testimony that it is a block after a lot of writing, but it's not stipulated by company policy.
If you use Google Docs web app, it is possible to save documents indefinitely, but if you save them indefinitely, it is the same as when you lose your Internet connection, you're going to sink and use MS word, right?)
Google Docs web app, cloud-connected web app, support for editing files utilizing a variety of programs, but it is still crude compared to office programs used on computers.Could it be obvious?)
Dropbox
It exerts its strongest power in media viewing. Photo folders? Could be flipped smoothly (Domestic cloud services require a certain amount of buffering time for each photo). However, in the event that you wait a little bit for the dropbox, the photos in one folder are loaded entirely. While looking at Photo A, Photo B is loaded and scrolling can be done without the blockage. Video? Beyond streaming, you can freely specify before start of playback. It is the best in the world in terms of media reading.
There are various means of increasing capacity. Camera upload settings, invitation of friends, events at the company level, etc.
The speed is relatively good. It is a lot faster compared to the Box and doesn't bother with Google Drive.
The file capacity limit which can be uploaded from a free account may be the largest. 300MB.
The bandwidth of the free account is larger than that of the Box. It really is updated by 20GB per day. It's practically infinite unless you're going to share large files.
The starting capacity is the smallest. Two gigabytes of dirt.
Price compared to capacity is the priciest cloud service. Dirty bastards...
There is a saying that changes in documents cannot be reflected instantly when working on documents.
Word documents shouldn't flip different files like picture documents.
The dropbox itself cannot be documented.
There are the most compatible apps in the mobile environment. In order to work on a document, it is possible to choose the interface you need through the app drive and focus on it leisurely.
Regarding document files, simple document inquiry is a convenient axis because previews are provided. Unlike additional.dropboxes, if you can find multiple Word documents in a folder, Word documents may also be flipped on the file or file, as is seen in the photo file.
File sharing support is fairly good. This box allows anyone who manages or creates a web page to share data conveniently with little use of the web page's resources. However, the bandwidth of the free account is 10GB per month, which is quite small.
Slow. Not paid people.
Media access is very disadvantageous. It's a whole lot worse than Google Drive, which says it's disadvantageous above. It's better to just do it on some type of computer than pay attention to it for a test.
The uploadable file capacity limit may be the smallest. 100MB. Free account only.
In a mobile environment, real-time documentation is rarely supported.
If you don't install Boxeditor, the documentation will be written with an extension that can only be written on Box (it works, so it is much better than Dropbox, but it's less than Google Drive).
It was recently updated (on 22 February?). Media access is now quite convenient. p2p순위 Especially photo files. However the pace is still a bit slow.***
Skydrive
The writing function is very powerful. Many cloud services offer Web apps. But Skydrive's is the most like the MS office documenting environment we've often used. And there are also the most supported handwriting, though it is four-legged.
The basic capacity is rather good. 7GB. Well, it isn't that strong a difference.
It is no exaggeration to state that the interface of mobile apps is the most backward cloud service ever.
Compared to the following clouds, media playback in mobile environments is advantageous. Especially in the case of videos, the next cloud has to be downloaded all together, while streaming. Merely to stream! I need to install another app again. Cloud alone isn't enough to stream.
Faster compared to the next cloud. About 20%.
Once you open a document with a cloud viewer, it breaks significantly less than another cloud (but breaking itself is already a problem).
Web app is supported. It's rudimentary, but it is possible to write. However, the problem is that the document format is really a bizarre format, such as .ndoc, which makes it extremely incompatible.
File sharing through the URL (but this is as far as another cloud is concerned).
Webhard
It includes a smaller capacity when compared to next cloud.
In comparison to foreign cloud services, it boasts poor service quality.
Compared to the next cloud, it is extremely disadvantageous for music playback. Continuous streaming is possible only for several selected sound sources. Another cloud only should be in a folder.
You should share a URL and that means you can't share music files or videos.
According to the report, you will find a saying that N drive appears like a local drive when installed, but only it happens like a local drive, which is no different from the folder synchronization setting. It's a whole lot worse for computers to begin with when external programs play tricks in it. It's much better to just clean up the synchronization folder.***
It is very specialized in playing music. In particular, it's the only cloud that can play sound sources in an environment much like MP3 players we are acquainted with. Although each song has some buffering, it appears to play around 192kpbs continuously, assuming that communication is in good condition in a 3G environment. Needless to say, in reality, it's often cut off at that point)
It includes a large capacity. This can be a significant advantage when considering domestic cloud services as a whole, which have poor quality of media access in cloud services.
You can substitute the finish drive above. In particular, if a picture is within a document, it really is rarely opened properly.
Streaming songs often cuts off (but not often) due to communication issues with the cloud, not Internet speed problems. Personally i think like it's about once every two hours. And when you listen to high-quality sound sources, it gets buffered often, or if you are in a place where the 3G environment isn't smooth, it gets cut off more often. And when it's in that state, you must discover the path of the folder where in fact the song was playing and play it again.
The only way to share is folder sharing. Only some documents or presentation files are available for file viewing. Aside from those points, you'll find nothing to say even if it really is almost a webhard level.
Foreign Cloud Comparison (Google Drive, Dropbox, Box, Skydrive)
Google Drive
It exerts tremendous power in writing documents. In particular, even without an office program, Google Drive can cover it somewhat. Not fancy ppts or fancy excels, nearly every simple document is OK.
It is beneficial to reflect the progress of work in the mobile environment. By establishing only offline views, the files you focus on can continue being reflected in the cloud instantly. This can be a very convenient feature for sharing files with other users.
It is easy to interact with other Google services such as Gmail.
Unless you upload documents right to the Google drive but write them on the Google drive web app, the capability of the file does not take into account cloud storage (what do you mean, if you just utilize the web app, the capacity of the Google drive is infinite).
Now, photo media access is strong at the dropbox level. It is possible to flip through photos and videos could be played right away. However, the loading time appears to take a little longer compared to the dropbox. I feel it), but it doesn't bother me.
There are probably the most apps that can be connected. In a desktop environment. Various connection apps allow various operations in the net environment without installing programs on the computer. It's a bit of a problem that the app doesn't connect at all on mobile, but it is the best in the desktop environment.
Upload a small pdf file and change it out to Google Docs format. It could then be stored again in MS Word format or something. However, it really is only possible with pdf files of 2MB or less.
There is no bandwidth restriction in name. There's a testimony that it is a block after a lot of writing, but it's not stipulated by company policy.
If you use Google Docs web app, it is possible to save documents indefinitely, but if you save them indefinitely, it is the same as when you lose your Internet connection, you're going to sink and use MS word, right?)
Google Docs web app, cloud-connected web app, support for editing files utilizing a variety of programs, but it is still crude compared to office programs used on computers.Could it be obvious?)
Dropbox
It exerts its strongest power in media viewing. Photo folders? Could be flipped smoothly (Domestic cloud services require a certain amount of buffering time for each photo). However, in the event that you wait a little bit for the dropbox, the photos in one folder are loaded entirely. While looking at Photo A, Photo B is loaded and scrolling can be done without the blockage. Video? Beyond streaming, you can freely specify before start of playback. It is the best in the world in terms of media reading.
There are various means of increasing capacity. Camera upload settings, invitation of friends, events at the company level, etc.
The speed is relatively good. It is a lot faster compared to the Box and doesn't bother with Google Drive.
The file capacity limit which can be uploaded from a free account may be the largest. 300MB.
The bandwidth of the free account is larger than that of the Box. It really is updated by 20GB per day. It's practically infinite unless you're going to share large files.
The starting capacity is the smallest. Two gigabytes of dirt.
Price compared to capacity is the priciest cloud service. Dirty bastards...
There is a saying that changes in documents cannot be reflected instantly when working on documents.
Word documents shouldn't flip different files like picture documents.
The dropbox itself cannot be documented.
There are the most compatible apps in the mobile environment. In order to work on a document, it is possible to choose the interface you need through the app drive and focus on it leisurely.
Regarding document files, simple document inquiry is a convenient axis because previews are provided. Unlike additional.dropboxes, if you can find multiple Word documents in a folder, Word documents may also be flipped on the file or file, as is seen in the photo file.
File sharing support is fairly good. This box allows anyone who manages or creates a web page to share data conveniently with little use of the web page's resources. However, the bandwidth of the free account is 10GB per month, which is quite small.
Slow. Not paid people.
Media access is very disadvantageous. It's a whole lot worse than Google Drive, which says it's disadvantageous above. It's better to just do it on some type of computer than pay attention to it for a test.
The uploadable file capacity limit may be the smallest. 100MB. Free account only.
In a mobile environment, real-time documentation is rarely supported.
If you don't install Boxeditor, the documentation will be written with an extension that can only be written on Box (it works, so it is much better than Dropbox, but it's less than Google Drive).
It was recently updated (on 22 February?). Media access is now quite convenient. p2p순위 Especially photo files. However the pace is still a bit slow.***
Skydrive
The writing function is very powerful. Many cloud services offer Web apps. But Skydrive's is the most like the MS office documenting environment we've often used. And there are also the most supported handwriting, though it is four-legged.
The basic capacity is rather good. 7GB. Well, it isn't that strong a difference.
It is no exaggeration to state that the interface of mobile apps is the most backward cloud service ever.
