what's webhard?
from web site
file down site
When compared to following clouds, media playback in mobile environments is advantageous. Especially regarding videos, the next cloud needs to be downloaded all together, while streaming. Merely to stream! I need to install another app again. Cloud alone isn't enough to stream.
Faster compared to the next cloud. About 20%.
When you open a document with a cloud viewer, it breaks significantly less than another cloud (but breaking itself is already a problem).
Web app is supported. It's rudimentary, but it is possible to write. However, the problem is that the document format is really a bizarre format, such as .ndoc, which makes it extremely incompatible.
File sharing through the URL (but this is as far as the next cloud is concerned).
Webhard
It has a smaller capacity compared to the next cloud.
Compared to foreign cloud services, it boasts poor service quality.
When compared to next cloud, it is extremely disadvantageous for music playback. Continuous streaming can be done only for several selected sound sources. Another cloud only has to be in a folder.
You have to share a URL and that means you can't share music files or videos.
According to the report, there is a saying that N drive looks like a local drive when installed, but only it happens like a local drive, that is no not the same as the folder synchronization setting. It's even worse for computers to begin with when external programs play tricks on them. It's much better to just clean up the synchronization folder.***
It is extremely specialized in playing music. In particular, it's the only cloud that may play sound sources in an environment much like MP3 players we are acquainted with. Although each song has some buffering, it seems to play around 192kpbs continuously, assuming that communication is in good shape in a 3G environment. Needless to say, in reality, it's often take off at that point)
It has a large capacity. This is a significant advantage when contemplating domestic cloud services all together, which have low quality of media access in cloud services.
You can substitute the finish drive above. In particular, in case a picture is within a document, it really is rarely opened properly.
Streaming songs often cuts off (but not often) due to communication issues with the cloud, not Internet speed problems. I feel like it's about once every two hours. And if you pay attention to high-quality sound sources, it gets buffered often, or if you're in a place where in fact the 3G environment isn't smooth, it gets take off more often. And when it's in that state, you will need to discover the path of the folder where in fact the song was playing and play it again.
The only way to share is folder sharing. Only some documents or presentation files are for sale to file viewing. Aside from those points, there is nothing to say even if it is almost a webhard level.
Foreign Cloud Comparison (Google Drive, Dropbox, Box, Skydrive)
Google Drive
It exerts tremendous power in writing documents. In particular, even lacking any office program, Google Drive can cover it somewhat. Not fancy ppts or fancy excels, almost any simple document is OK.
It is beneficial to reflect the progress of work in the mobile environment. By establishing only offline views, the files you work on can continue to be reflected in the cloud in real time. It is just a very convenient feature for sharing files with other users.
It is easy to interact with other Google services such as for example Gmail.
If you don't upload documents right to the Google drive but write them on the Google drive web app, the capability of the file will not take into account cloud storage (what can you mean, if you just use the web app, the capacity of the Google drive is infinite).
Now, photo media access is strong at the dropbox level. You can flip through photos and videos can be played right away. However, the loading time seems to take a little longer than the dropbox. I feel it), nonetheless it doesn't bother me.
There are the most apps which might be connected. In a desktop environment. Various connection apps allow various operations in the web environment without installing programs on the computer. It's a bit of a problem that the app doesn't connect at all on mobile, but it's the best in the desktop environment.
Upload a little pdf file and change it to Google Docs format. It can then be stored again in MS Word format or something. However, it is only possible with pdf files of 2MB or less.
There is absolutely no bandwidth restriction in name. There's a testimony that it's a block after a large amount of writing, but it isn't stipulated by company policy.
If you are using Google Docs web app, you can save documents indefinitely, but if you save them indefinitely, it is the same as once you lose your Internet connection, you're going to sink and use MS word, right?)
Google Docs web app, cloud-connected web app, support for editing files using a variety of programs, nonetheless it is still crude in comparison to office programs used on computers.Could it be obvious?)
p2p 순위 Dropbox
It exerts its strongest power in media viewing. Photo folders? Can be flipped smoothly (Domestic cloud services require a specific amount of buffering time for every photo). However, if you wait a bit for the dropbox, the photos in one folder are loaded entirely. While considering Photo A, Photo B is loaded and scrolling is possible without the blockage. Video? Beyond streaming, it is possible to freely specify until the start of playback. It is the best in the world when it comes to media reading.
There are various method of increasing capacity. Camera upload settings, invitation of friends, events at the business level, etc.
The speed is relatively good. It is a lot faster than the Box and doesn't bother with Google Drive.
The file capacity limit that can be uploaded from the free account may be the largest. 300MB.
The bandwidth of the free account is larger than that of the Box. It is updated by 20GB per day. It's practically infinite unless you're going to share large files.
The starting capacity may be the smallest. Two gigabytes of dirt.
Price compared to capacity is the priciest cloud service. Dirty bastards...
There exists a saying that changes in documents can't be reflected instantly when working on documents.
Word documents shouldn't flip different files like picture documents.
The dropbox itself cannot be documented.
There are the most compatible apps in the mobile environment. In order to work on a document, you can choose the interface you need through the app drive and work on it leisurely.
Regarding document files, simple document inquiry is really a convenient axis because previews are provided. Unlike additional.dropboxes, if you can find multiple Word documents in a folder, Word documents may also be flipped on the file or file, as is seen in the photo file.
File sharing support is fairly good. This box allows anyone who manages or creates a web page to share data conveniently with little usage of the net page's resources. However, the bandwidth of the free account is 10GB monthly, which is quite small.
Slow. Not paid people.
Media access is very disadvantageous. It's a whole lot worse than Google Drive, which says it's disadvantageous above. It's better to just do it on a computer than pay attention to it for a test.
The uploadable file capacity limit is the smallest. 100MB. Free account only.
In a mobile environment, real-time documentation is rarely supported.
Unless you install Boxeditor, the documentation will undoubtedly be written with an extension that may only be written on Box (it works, so it is much better than Dropbox, but it's less than Google Drive).
It was recently updated (on 22 February?). Media access is now quite convenient. Especially photo files. But the pace is still a bit slow.***
Skydrive
The writing function is very powerful. Many cloud services offer Web apps. But Skydrive's may be the most like the MS office documenting environment we've often used. And there are also the most supported handwriting, though it is four-legged.
The basic capacity is quite good. 7GB. Well, it's not that strong a difference.
It is no exaggeration to state that the interface of mobile apps may be the most backward cloud service ever.
When compared to following clouds, media playback in mobile environments is advantageous. Especially regarding videos, the next cloud needs to be downloaded all together, while streaming. Merely to stream! I need to install another app again. Cloud alone isn't enough to stream.
Faster compared to the next cloud. About 20%.
When you open a document with a cloud viewer, it breaks significantly less than another cloud (but breaking itself is already a problem).
Web app is supported. It's rudimentary, but it is possible to write. However, the problem is that the document format is really a bizarre format, such as .ndoc, which makes it extremely incompatible.
File sharing through the URL (but this is as far as the next cloud is concerned).
Webhard
It has a smaller capacity compared to the next cloud.
Compared to foreign cloud services, it boasts poor service quality.
When compared to next cloud, it is extremely disadvantageous for music playback. Continuous streaming can be done only for several selected sound sources. Another cloud only has to be in a folder.
You have to share a URL and that means you can't share music files or videos.
According to the report, there is a saying that N drive looks like a local drive when installed, but only it happens like a local drive, that is no not the same as the folder synchronization setting. It's even worse for computers to begin with when external programs play tricks on them. It's much better to just clean up the synchronization folder.***
It is extremely specialized in playing music. In particular, it's the only cloud that may play sound sources in an environment much like MP3 players we are acquainted with. Although each song has some buffering, it seems to play around 192kpbs continuously, assuming that communication is in good shape in a 3G environment. Needless to say, in reality, it's often take off at that point)
It has a large capacity. This is a significant advantage when contemplating domestic cloud services all together, which have low quality of media access in cloud services.
You can substitute the finish drive above. In particular, in case a picture is within a document, it really is rarely opened properly.
Streaming songs often cuts off (but not often) due to communication issues with the cloud, not Internet speed problems. I feel like it's about once every two hours. And if you pay attention to high-quality sound sources, it gets buffered often, or if you're in a place where in fact the 3G environment isn't smooth, it gets take off more often. And when it's in that state, you will need to discover the path of the folder where in fact the song was playing and play it again.
The only way to share is folder sharing. Only some documents or presentation files are for sale to file viewing. Aside from those points, there is nothing to say even if it is almost a webhard level.
Foreign Cloud Comparison (Google Drive, Dropbox, Box, Skydrive)
Google Drive
It exerts tremendous power in writing documents. In particular, even lacking any office program, Google Drive can cover it somewhat. Not fancy ppts or fancy excels, almost any simple document is OK.
It is beneficial to reflect the progress of work in the mobile environment. By establishing only offline views, the files you work on can continue to be reflected in the cloud in real time. It is just a very convenient feature for sharing files with other users.
It is easy to interact with other Google services such as for example Gmail.
If you don't upload documents right to the Google drive but write them on the Google drive web app, the capability of the file will not take into account cloud storage (what can you mean, if you just use the web app, the capacity of the Google drive is infinite).
Now, photo media access is strong at the dropbox level. You can flip through photos and videos can be played right away. However, the loading time seems to take a little longer than the dropbox. I feel it), nonetheless it doesn't bother me.
There are the most apps which might be connected. In a desktop environment. Various connection apps allow various operations in the web environment without installing programs on the computer. It's a bit of a problem that the app doesn't connect at all on mobile, but it's the best in the desktop environment.
Upload a little pdf file and change it to Google Docs format. It can then be stored again in MS Word format or something. However, it is only possible with pdf files of 2MB or less.
There is absolutely no bandwidth restriction in name. There's a testimony that it's a block after a large amount of writing, but it isn't stipulated by company policy.
If you are using Google Docs web app, you can save documents indefinitely, but if you save them indefinitely, it is the same as once you lose your Internet connection, you're going to sink and use MS word, right?)
Google Docs web app, cloud-connected web app, support for editing files using a variety of programs, nonetheless it is still crude in comparison to office programs used on computers.Could it be obvious?)
p2p 순위 Dropbox
It exerts its strongest power in media viewing. Photo folders? Can be flipped smoothly (Domestic cloud services require a specific amount of buffering time for every photo). However, if you wait a bit for the dropbox, the photos in one folder are loaded entirely. While considering Photo A, Photo B is loaded and scrolling is possible without the blockage. Video? Beyond streaming, it is possible to freely specify until the start of playback. It is the best in the world when it comes to media reading.
There are various method of increasing capacity. Camera upload settings, invitation of friends, events at the business level, etc.
The speed is relatively good. It is a lot faster than the Box and doesn't bother with Google Drive.
The file capacity limit that can be uploaded from the free account may be the largest. 300MB.
The bandwidth of the free account is larger than that of the Box. It is updated by 20GB per day. It's practically infinite unless you're going to share large files.
The starting capacity may be the smallest. Two gigabytes of dirt.
Price compared to capacity is the priciest cloud service. Dirty bastards...
There exists a saying that changes in documents can't be reflected instantly when working on documents.
Word documents shouldn't flip different files like picture documents.
The dropbox itself cannot be documented.
There are the most compatible apps in the mobile environment. In order to work on a document, you can choose the interface you need through the app drive and work on it leisurely.
Regarding document files, simple document inquiry is really a convenient axis because previews are provided. Unlike additional.dropboxes, if you can find multiple Word documents in a folder, Word documents may also be flipped on the file or file, as is seen in the photo file.
File sharing support is fairly good. This box allows anyone who manages or creates a web page to share data conveniently with little usage of the net page's resources. However, the bandwidth of the free account is 10GB monthly, which is quite small.
Slow. Not paid people.
Media access is very disadvantageous. It's a whole lot worse than Google Drive, which says it's disadvantageous above. It's better to just do it on a computer than pay attention to it for a test.
The uploadable file capacity limit is the smallest. 100MB. Free account only.
In a mobile environment, real-time documentation is rarely supported.
Unless you install Boxeditor, the documentation will undoubtedly be written with an extension that may only be written on Box (it works, so it is much better than Dropbox, but it's less than Google Drive).
It was recently updated (on 22 February?). Media access is now quite convenient. Especially photo files. But the pace is still a bit slow.***
Skydrive
The writing function is very powerful. Many cloud services offer Web apps. But Skydrive's may be the most like the MS office documenting environment we've often used. And there are also the most supported handwriting, though it is four-legged.
The basic capacity is quite good. 7GB. Well, it's not that strong a difference.
It is no exaggeration to state that the interface of mobile apps may be the most backward cloud service ever.
