from web site
Chambered in. 308, with a. 260 Remington likewise offered, the 20" CTR series shows twist rates within the barrels of 11" here, and 8" in the 6. 5mm. 260, to permit bullets towards the much heavier end of the spectrum in either calibre to fly true. I'm a substantial. 260 fan and own 2 myself, so given the sudden rush of popularity of the 6. 5 Creedmoor, which is practically similar, I see the Tikka launch in. 260 as a bit of a slow-motion catch up. I like. 260 and have no reason to switch to a Creedmoor, however offered the popularity and availability of top quality match ammunition, the adoption of.
308 comes quite late in the day. In the UK,. 260 is a hand-loader's calibre quite much specifically, and if United States manufacturers are making them, I have actually never seen any. Both 6. 5mm calibre and. 308 show wide availability of reloading components, so in this regard, does the change matter? Reference are cold hammer created and have consistently revealed good efficiencies to withstand the company's three-shot MOA, which is guaranteed 'from the box'. This stainless variation starts out at the crown at a 16x1mm metric thread for a brake or sound moderator, and the addition of one is probably fairly likely, although I didn't have anything available to me because thread size during the test.
260 which does like a slower burning propellant, and speed is its buddy. Swelling from 20mm at the muzzle as much as 32mm at the action, it floats freely up until about 75mm from the breech, where the sides of the stock inlet drift in to fulfill the barrel. rsh jan weapon test, The stock fore-end reveals a sling stud and supports the barrel with appropriate tightness, however I do not and have actually never liked this impingement, and it constantly seems like the gun requires to show to me that it works (however I never, ever forget). I desire a barrel in complete contact or no contact; in my mind, I just feel it's more stable.