Skip to main contentdfsdf

Home/ closetopen0's Library/ Notes/ Let's look at the advantages and disadvantages of rental and built-in webdisk

Let's look at the advantages and disadvantages of rental and built-in webdisk

from web site

웹하드

Let's look at the advantages and disadvantages of rental and built-in webhard.

Rental webharders include Dacom Webhard, Ucloud, and KT Webhard. This refers to a service that shares idc's server resources with other users.

Built-in webhard solutions include Internet disks, linkhard, plus disks, ncs, and Ajaxplar.

The rental type has the benefit of having a server on idc, so it does not have to be managed separately, and the initial setting cost is low.

However, you need to pay monthly maintenance for capacity and traffic, pay for capacity and traffic costs, and move files to other servers.

There are disadvantages such as for example dual subscription to internal services (homepages, intranet) along with other domains.


Built-in Webhard leverages specific hardware (internal resources) to create services, freeing up capacity and traffic.

It gets the burden of initial setting costs. Large companies do not use rental solutions. Webhard is not only a Webhard, it's a company.

It is because it is confidential and knows the energy of strategic sharing and well-managed data.


Link hard solutions have emerged based on the intention that small and medium-sized businesses should build webhard without any burden.
노제휴 웹하드 It does not need to purchase H/W separately, and the solution alone allows users to build Webhard by utilizing the required pc, NAS, and server equipment.
If you already had a website or intranet, it is possible to stop unnecessary work that used to run the site.

OK to create installed blogs or bulletin boards.

By increasing utilization through intranet, groupware, kms, and the business's homepage in addition to the Webhard's original function, the thought of creating a use-oriented product makes one look forward to the expansion of the solution.

The price is also from 300,000 won for 30 people, and this can be fully built in Soho, so the parts that have been agonizing over setting and maintenance costs will be solved a lot.


It is now essential for Soho to establish a web hard system.

Rental vs. Construction.


Webhard reminds you of a very useful and convenient Online sites that allows one to download files online at a set monthly cost. Therefore the application of web hard has become common.



But it's not just recently that this concept arrived, and it's true that it is been a long time. As soon as it came out, lots of people used it, and there have been many office workers who didn't join it or even paid for their personal expenses because of lack of capacity, and you can find probably still some now.



The biggest background of this phenomenon is the rapidly growing file capacity of materials such as work used, while there are lots of burdens and inconveniences to cover monthly expenses based on limited capacity. In addition, the service is provided against the backdrop of a big portal, which also results in security concerns concerning the leakage of confidential information, which is why the company won't adopt it.


In some cases, additionally, there are many implementations of SI projects that build installation-only webhard that meet up with the needs of users' needs. The deployment of a standalone server consists of a server (HW)+ operating-system (Server OS)+ webhard solution (high-priced licenses based on the number of users), which is prohibitive in comparison to using monthly webhard when maintenance services are included.



NAS offers a highly cost-effective, easy-to-install and easy-to-operate webhard for anybody with significantly reduce the needs of the webhard users. Webhard is very innovative because it supports uploading files by default. It's a excellent feature because DDNS, etc. can be accessed from the outside without needing to buy an authorized IP.



Unfortunately, there are functional limitations because the basic webhard included in these NAS is basic. Because the word "basic" implies, it isn't a webhard solution developed at a high cost. As a result, webhard modules for NAS mounts are recently available with the capabilities and peaks of expensive, built-in webhard solutions. Of course, it's a paid option, but it is a very low-cost, very helpful solution that's less than a tenth of the expense of building a single server.


Now, NAS and Webhard meet to integrate Intranet & Extranet at low cost, developing a small but powerful collaborative file server. I'll check out the rough top features of Webhard and guide you. You can go over it and choose the best one according to the reality and needs.
closetopen0

Saved by closetopen0

on Dec 16, 21