Skip to main contentdfsdf

Home/ jasonlion34's Library/ Notes/ Let's look at the pros and cons of rental and built-in webhard

Let's look at the pros and cons of rental and built-in webhard

from web site

웹하드

Let's look at the benefits and drawbacks of rental and built-in webhard.

Rental webharders include Dacom Webhard, Ucloud, and KT Webhard. This identifies a service that shares idc's server resources with other users.

Built-in webhard solutions include Internet disks, linkhard, plus disks, ncs, and Ajaxplar.

The rental type has the benefit of having a server on idc, so that it does not have to be managed separately, and the original setting cost is low.

However, you must pay monthly maintenance for capacity and traffic, pay for capacity and traffic costs, and move files to other servers.

There are disadvantages such as for example dual subscription to internal services (homepages, intranet) and other domains.


Built-in Webhard leverages specific hardware (internal resources) to create services, freeing up capacity and traffic.

It gets the burden of initial setting costs. Large companies do not use rental solutions. Webhard is not just a Webhard, it's a company.

It is because it is confidential and knows the power of strategic sharing and well-managed data.


Link hard solutions have emerged based on the intention that small and medium-sized businesses should build webhard without any burden.
It does not have to purchase H/W separately, and the solution alone allows users to create Webhard by utilizing the desired pc, NAS, and server equipment.
If you already had an internet site or intranet, you can stop unnecessary work which used to run the site.

OK to set up installed blogs or bulletin boards.

By increasing utilization through intranet, groupware, kms, and the business's homepage along with the Webhard's original function, the thought of creating a use-oriented product makes one anticipate the expansion of the perfect solution is.

The price can be from 300,000 won for 30 people, that may be fully built in Soho, therefore the parts that have been agonizing over setting and maintenance costs will undoubtedly be solved a lot.


It is now essential for Soho to establish a web hard system.

Rental vs. Construction.


Webhard reminds you of an extremely useful and convenient Online sites that allows one to download files on the internet at a set monthly cost. Because of this using web hard is becoming common.



But it's not just recently that this concept arrived, and it's true that it's been a long time. As soon as it came out, many people used it, and there have been many workers in offices who didn't sign up for it or even covered their personal expenses because of lack of capacity, and there are probably still some now.



The biggest background of this phenomenon may be the rapidly growing file capacity of materials such as work used, while there are lots of burdens and inconveniences to cover monthly expenses predicated on limited capacity. Furthermore, the service is provided against the backdrop of a large portal, which also leads to security concerns about the leakage of confidential information, which explains why the company won't adopt it.


In some cases, additionally, there are many implementations of SI projects that build installation-only webhard that meet the needs of users' needs. The deployment of a standalone server includes a server (HW)+ operating-system (Server OS)+ webhard solution (high-priced licenses using the number of users), which is prohibitive compared to using monthly webhard when maintenance services are included.



NAS offers a highly cost-effective, easy-to-install and easy-to-operate webhard for anyone with significantly reduce the needs of the webhard users. Webhard is very innovative because it supports uploading files by default. It's a excellent feature because DDNS, etc. can be accessed from the outside and never have to buy an authorized IP.



Unfortunately, you can find functional limitations as the basic webhard included in these NAS is basic. Because the word "basic" implies, it's not a webhard solution developed at a higher cost. Due to this fact, webhard modules for NAS mounts are recently available with the capabilities and peaks of expensive, built-in webhard solutions. 웹하드 순위 Of course, it is a paid option, but it's a very low-cost, very useful solution that's less than a tenth of the expense of building a single server.


Now, NAS and Webhard meet to integrate Intranet & Extranet at low cost, developing a small but powerful collaborative file server. I'll have a look at the rough features of Webhard and guide you. You can go over it and choose the best one based on the reality and needs.
jasonlion34

Saved by jasonlion34

on Dec 16, 21