Skip to main contentdfsdf

Home/ mindrun42's Library/ Notes/ Let's look at the pros and cons of rental and built-in donwload site

Let's look at the pros and cons of rental and built-in donwload site

from web site

p2p 순위

Let's look at the pros and cons of rental and built-in webhard.

Rental webharders include Dacom Webhard, Ucloud, and KT Webhard. This identifies something that shares idc's server resources with other users.

Built-in webhard solutions include Internet disks, linkhard, plus disks, ncs, and Ajaxplar.

The rental type gets the benefit of having a server on idc, so that it doesn't have to be managed separately, and the original setting cost is low.

However, you will need to pay monthly maintenance for capacity and traffic, purchase capacity and traffic costs, and move files to other servers.

There are disadvantages such as for example dual subscription to internal services (homepages, intranet) along with other domains.


웹하드 순위 Built-in Webhard leverages specific hardware (internal resources) to create services, freeing up capacity and traffic.

It gets the burden of initial setting costs. Large companies usually do not use rental solutions. Webhard is not only a Webhard, it's a company.

It is because it is confidential and knows the power of strategic sharing and well-managed data.


Link hard solutions have emerged based on the intention that small and medium-sized businesses should build webhard without any burden.
It does not need to purchase H/W separately, and the perfect solution is alone allows users to create Webhard by utilizing the required pc, NAS, and server equipment.
If you already had a website or intranet, you can stop unnecessary work which used to run the site.

OK to set up installed blogs or bulletin boards.

By increasing utilization through intranet, groupware, kms, and the business's homepage along with the Webhard's original function, the idea of creating a use-oriented product makes one anticipate the expansion of the answer.

The price can be from 300,000 won for 30 people, and this can be fully built in Soho, therefore the parts which have been agonizing over setting and maintenance costs will be solved a lot.


It is now essential for Soho to determine a web hard system.

Rental vs. Construction.


Webhard reminds you of an extremely useful and convenient Online sites that allows you to download files over the Internet at a set monthly cost. This means that the usage of web hard has become common.



But it's not just recently that this concept came out, and it's true that it's been a long time. When it came out, many people used it, and there have been many workers in offices who didn't join it or even covered their personal expenses due to lack of capacity, and there are probably still some now.



The biggest background of the phenomenon is the rapidly growing file capacity of materials such as work used, while there are many burdens and inconveniences to cover monthly expenses based on limited capacity. Furthermore, the service is provided against the backdrop of a large portal, which also leads to security concerns concerning the leakage of confidential information, which is why the company won't adopt it.


In some cases, additionally, there are many implementations of SI projects that build installation-only webhard that meet the needs of users' needs. The deployment of a standalone server consists of a server (HW)+ operating system (Server OS)+ webhard solution (high-priced licenses based on the number of users), that is prohibitive in comparison to using monthly webhard when maintenance services are included.



NAS offers a highly cost-effective, easy-to-install and easy-to-operate webhard for anyone with significantly decrease the needs of the webhard users. Webhard is very innovative since it supports uploading files automagically. It's a really good feature because DDNS, etc. can be accessed from the outside without having to buy an authorized IP.



Unfortunately, there are functional limitations as the basic webhard contained in these NAS is basic. Because the word "basic" implies, it's not a webhard solution developed at a higher cost. Due to this fact, webhard modules for NAS mounts are recently available with the capabilities and peaks of expensive, built-in webhard solutions. Needless to say, it's a paid option, but it is a very low-cost, very useful solution that's significantly less than a tenth of the cost of building a single server.


Now, NAS and Webhard meet to integrate Intranet & Extranet at low cost, creating a small but powerful collaborative file server. I'll check out the rough top features of Webhard and guide you. You can go over it and choose the right one based on the reality and needs.
mindrun42

Saved by mindrun42

on Feb 07, 22