Secret Behind Technology Blogging and site-building
from web site
"Technology in the long-run is irrelevant". That is college thinks customer in mine informed me when I produced a demonstration to him about a cool product. I had been discussing the product's features and benefits and listed "state-of-the-art technology" or perhaps something to that effect, among them. That is when he made his statement. We realized afterwards that having been correct, at least within the setting of how My spouse and i used "Technology" in my business presentation. But My spouse and i began wondering about whether maybe he is right consist of contexts as well.
What is Technology?
Merriam-Webster describes it as:
1. a: the practical application of knowledge especially in a particular spot: engineering only two
m: a capability given by the practical application expertise
two : a manner from accomplishing a job especially working with technical operations, methods, or perhaps knowledge
several : the specific aspects of a selected field of endeavor
Wikipedia becomes it just as:
Technology (from Greek τÎχνη, techne, "art, skill, scheming of hand"; and -λογία, -logia[1]) may be the making, change, usage, and knowledge of tools, machines, tactics, crafts, programs, and ways of organization, in order to solve a problem, improve some preexisting cure for a problem, achieve a goal, control an employed input/output relative or execute a specific labor. https://thecitrusreport.com/ can also make reference to the collection from such tools, including devices, modifications, preparations and methods. Technologies considerably affect real as well as other creature species' power to control and adapt to the natural conditions. The term can either be applied generally or to certain areas: for example construction technology, medical technology, and technology.
Both meanings revolve around the same - app and application.
Technology is an enabler
Many people mistakenly believe it is technology which in turn drives creativity. Yet from your definitions previously mentioned, that is plainly not the case. It can be opportunity of which defines innovation and technology which permits innovation. Bring to mind the classic "Build a better mousetrap" example taught in most business enterprise schools. You might have the technology to build a better mousetrap, but once you have zero mice as well as old mousetrap works well, there is not any opportunity then the technology to build an improved one transforms into irrelevant. On the flip side, if you are overrun with mice then a opportunity prevails to innovate a product using your technology.
An additional example, an individual with which I just is thoroughly familiar, are consumer electronics international companies. For a nice and associated with the two those that succeeded and those that failed. Each one possessed unique leading edge technology. The difference was opportunity. The ones that failed could not find the opportunity to develop a important innovation making use of their technology. Actually to survive, these businesses had to warp oftentimes right into something completely different and if these folks were lucky they could take advantage of derivatives of their unique technology. Usually, the original technology wound up in the scrap pile. Technology, as a result, is an enabler whose best value proposition is to make improvements to our lives. To be relevant, it requires to be utilized to create enhancements that are motivated by prospect.
Technology in the form of competitive edge?
Many companies list a technology as one of their whole competitive positive aspects. Is this in force? In some cases absolutely, but In most cases no .
Technology develops combined two walkways - an evolutionary route and new path.
A new technology the which helps new sectors or makes it possible for solutions to issues that were until now not possible. Semiconductor technology is an excellent example. Not only did it breed new market sectors and items, but it spawned the creation of other cutting edge technologies supports transistor technology, integrated circuit technology, microprocessor technology. Every which provide you with many of the products we ingest today. Nevertheless is semiconductor technology some competitive advantages? Looking at how many semiconductor corporations that exist at this time (with new ones being created every day), I'd say not. How about microprocessor technology? Again, number Lots of processor companies available on the market. How about quad core processor technology? Quite a bit less many companies, however you have Intel, AMD, SUPPLY, and a host of companies setting up custom quad core cpus (Apple, Samsung korea, Qualcomm, etc). So again, not much of an competitive benefits. Competition via competing solutions and easy admission to IP minimizes the identified competitive good thing about any special technology. Android mobile phone vs iOS is a good example of how that works. Both equally operating systems happen to be derivatives in UNIX. Apple used their particular technology to introduce iOS and increased an early current market advantage. However , Google, applying their variant from Unix (a competing technology), caught up comparatively quickly. The reasons for this are lying not inside the underlying technology, but in the products authorized by individuals technologies are brought to current market (free or walled garden, etc . ) and the variations in the proper visions of each company.
Major technology the which incrementally builds upon the base cutting edge technology. Nevertheless by it's very nature, the incremental difference is easier to get a competitor to check or leapfrog. Take for example wifi cellphone technology. Company Sixth v introduced 4-G products previous to Company A fabulous and while it could have had any term advantage, as soon as Business A created their 4G products, the bonus due to technology disappeared. The consumer went back to choosing Company A fabulous or Company V depending on price, service, coverage, no matter what, but not depending on technology. Hence technology has been relevant on any given day, but in the long term, became less relevant.
In today's world, systems tend to get commoditized, and within any particular technology lies the seeds of its own loss of life.
Technology's Significance
This article was written on the prospective associated with an end customer. From a developer/designer standpoint stuff get murkier. The further one is taken out of the technology, the not as much relevant it might be. To a developer, the technology can look being a product. A great enabling merchandise, but a solution nonetheless, thereby it is exceptionally relevant. Bose uses a secret signal producing technology to allow products the fact that meet a collection of market requirements and thus the technology and what it makes it possible for is relevant to them. Their customers are more involved with how this might sound, what's the cost, what's toughness, etc ., instead of so much with how it is achieved, as a result the technology used is quite a bit less relevant to them.
Just lately, I was linked to a discussion at Google+ the new Motorola X telephone. A lot of the persons on all those posts criticized the phone to get various factors - price tag, locked start loader, etc . There were also plenty of knocks on the fact which it didn't enjoy a quad-core processor like the S4 or THE ALL NEW HTC One which had been priced similarly. What they did not grasp usually whether the supplier used 1, 2, 5, or 8 cores ultimately makes simply no difference as long as the phone can certainly deliver a affordable (or possibly best of class) feature place, functionality, value, and individual experience. The iPhone is one of the most outstanding phones ever previously produced, but it goes on a dual core processor. It however delivers among the best user activities on the market. The features that are allowed by the technology are precisely what are relevant to the consumer, not the technology by itself.
The appropriateness of technology therefore , can be as an enabler, not as a product feature or a competitive advantages, or any numerous other things supports an enabler. Looking at the Android operating-system, it is an impressive piece of software technology, and yet Google and bing gives it off of. Why? Considering standalone, it does nothing meant for Google. Creating away makes it possible for other companies to apply their know-how to build products which then make enablers designed for Google's goods and services. To Google and bing, that's from where the real importance is.
The possession of or perhaps access to some technology is important for what it enables you to perform - produce innovations of which solve problems. That is the real relevance in technology.
What is Technology?
Merriam-Webster describes it as:
1. a: the practical application of knowledge especially in a particular spot: engineering only two
m: a capability given by the practical application expertise
two : a manner from accomplishing a job especially working with technical operations, methods, or perhaps knowledge
several : the specific aspects of a selected field of endeavor
Wikipedia becomes it just as:
Technology (from Greek τÎχνη, techne, "art, skill, scheming of hand"; and -λογία, -logia[1]) may be the making, change, usage, and knowledge of tools, machines, tactics, crafts, programs, and ways of organization, in order to solve a problem, improve some preexisting cure for a problem, achieve a goal, control an employed input/output relative or execute a specific labor. https://thecitrusreport.com/ can also make reference to the collection from such tools, including devices, modifications, preparations and methods. Technologies considerably affect real as well as other creature species' power to control and adapt to the natural conditions. The term can either be applied generally or to certain areas: for example construction technology, medical technology, and technology.
Both meanings revolve around the same - app and application.
Technology is an enabler
Many people mistakenly believe it is technology which in turn drives creativity. Yet from your definitions previously mentioned, that is plainly not the case. It can be opportunity of which defines innovation and technology which permits innovation. Bring to mind the classic "Build a better mousetrap" example taught in most business enterprise schools. You might have the technology to build a better mousetrap, but once you have zero mice as well as old mousetrap works well, there is not any opportunity then the technology to build an improved one transforms into irrelevant. On the flip side, if you are overrun with mice then a opportunity prevails to innovate a product using your technology.
An additional example, an individual with which I just is thoroughly familiar, are consumer electronics international companies. For a nice and associated with the two those that succeeded and those that failed. Each one possessed unique leading edge technology. The difference was opportunity. The ones that failed could not find the opportunity to develop a important innovation making use of their technology. Actually to survive, these businesses had to warp oftentimes right into something completely different and if these folks were lucky they could take advantage of derivatives of their unique technology. Usually, the original technology wound up in the scrap pile. Technology, as a result, is an enabler whose best value proposition is to make improvements to our lives. To be relevant, it requires to be utilized to create enhancements that are motivated by prospect.
Technology in the form of competitive edge?
Many companies list a technology as one of their whole competitive positive aspects. Is this in force? In some cases absolutely, but In most cases no .
Technology develops combined two walkways - an evolutionary route and new path.
A new technology the which helps new sectors or makes it possible for solutions to issues that were until now not possible. Semiconductor technology is an excellent example. Not only did it breed new market sectors and items, but it spawned the creation of other cutting edge technologies supports transistor technology, integrated circuit technology, microprocessor technology. Every which provide you with many of the products we ingest today. Nevertheless is semiconductor technology some competitive advantages? Looking at how many semiconductor corporations that exist at this time (with new ones being created every day), I'd say not. How about microprocessor technology? Again, number Lots of processor companies available on the market. How about quad core processor technology? Quite a bit less many companies, however you have Intel, AMD, SUPPLY, and a host of companies setting up custom quad core cpus (Apple, Samsung korea, Qualcomm, etc). So again, not much of an competitive benefits. Competition via competing solutions and easy admission to IP minimizes the identified competitive good thing about any special technology. Android mobile phone vs iOS is a good example of how that works. Both equally operating systems happen to be derivatives in UNIX. Apple used their particular technology to introduce iOS and increased an early current market advantage. However , Google, applying their variant from Unix (a competing technology), caught up comparatively quickly. The reasons for this are lying not inside the underlying technology, but in the products authorized by individuals technologies are brought to current market (free or walled garden, etc . ) and the variations in the proper visions of each company.
Major technology the which incrementally builds upon the base cutting edge technology. Nevertheless by it's very nature, the incremental difference is easier to get a competitor to check or leapfrog. Take for example wifi cellphone technology. Company Sixth v introduced 4-G products previous to Company A fabulous and while it could have had any term advantage, as soon as Business A created their 4G products, the bonus due to technology disappeared. The consumer went back to choosing Company A fabulous or Company V depending on price, service, coverage, no matter what, but not depending on technology. Hence technology has been relevant on any given day, but in the long term, became less relevant.
In today's world, systems tend to get commoditized, and within any particular technology lies the seeds of its own loss of life.
Technology's Significance
This article was written on the prospective associated with an end customer. From a developer/designer standpoint stuff get murkier. The further one is taken out of the technology, the not as much relevant it might be. To a developer, the technology can look being a product. A great enabling merchandise, but a solution nonetheless, thereby it is exceptionally relevant. Bose uses a secret signal producing technology to allow products the fact that meet a collection of market requirements and thus the technology and what it makes it possible for is relevant to them. Their customers are more involved with how this might sound, what's the cost, what's toughness, etc ., instead of so much with how it is achieved, as a result the technology used is quite a bit less relevant to them.
Just lately, I was linked to a discussion at Google+ the new Motorola X telephone. A lot of the persons on all those posts criticized the phone to get various factors - price tag, locked start loader, etc . There were also plenty of knocks on the fact which it didn't enjoy a quad-core processor like the S4 or THE ALL NEW HTC One which had been priced similarly. What they did not grasp usually whether the supplier used 1, 2, 5, or 8 cores ultimately makes simply no difference as long as the phone can certainly deliver a affordable (or possibly best of class) feature place, functionality, value, and individual experience. The iPhone is one of the most outstanding phones ever previously produced, but it goes on a dual core processor. It however delivers among the best user activities on the market. The features that are allowed by the technology are precisely what are relevant to the consumer, not the technology by itself.
The appropriateness of technology therefore , can be as an enabler, not as a product feature or a competitive advantages, or any numerous other things supports an enabler. Looking at the Android operating-system, it is an impressive piece of software technology, and yet Google and bing gives it off of. Why? Considering standalone, it does nothing meant for Google. Creating away makes it possible for other companies to apply their know-how to build products which then make enablers designed for Google's goods and services. To Google and bing, that's from where the real importance is.
The possession of or perhaps access to some technology is important for what it enables you to perform - produce innovations of which solve problems. That is the real relevance in technology.
