from web site
USCIS might not avoid such witnesses from withdrawing or altering prior statements. Nevertheless, Keep Checking Back Here might negatively impact the trustworthiness of the witness. If an officer determines that the statement of a witness is not reliable, the written choice or interview notes or both should suggest this conclusion. Nevertheless, it usually is not sufficient to just say that the witness is not trustworthy.

Privileged Statement Officers may sometimes experience the problem of benefit. A testimonial benefit permits the individual who invokes it to disallow testimony that would break the privilege. Examples include the privilege versus self-incrimination and spousal opportunities. Each benefit differs a little in how it uses, such as whose testament might be barred and who may invoke the advantage.
Sworn Statements An officer may likewise take a sworn declaration. A sworn statement is a composed statement offered under an oath (or affirmation). It should be seen and signed and include an accurate record of the questions asked, and answers received. The sworn statement enters into the irreversible, official record and may be utilized in a subsequent proceeding or prosecution.
An officer taking a sworn statement must concentrate on collecting all necessary information to make a choice. The officer should structure the statement in a way that is logical, utilizing a clear development of facts and concerns. Officers ought to explore each pertinent reality discovered in a statement by additional questioning to the extent essential prior to altering subjects.

Upon request, USCIS offers a copy of the signed sworn declaration to an affiant, without fee, at the conclusion of the interview where the declaration was taken. 3. Professional and Viewpoint Proof On celebration, officers might require proof from an expert to assist in completing an adjudication. For instance, in cases including handwritten, fake, or transformed files, U.S.
A requestor might also send evidence from a non-DHS professional. An expert is allowed to offer an opinion on a particular set of facts or situations including clinical, technical, or other specialized understanding. Knowledge, ability, experience, training, or education needs to qualify the professional. Officers might turn down or afford lesser evidentiary weight to specialist opinions that clash with the evidence of record or are doubtful.
