from web site
Jung spoke of truths that touched our hearts and sparked within us the recognition of something we believed we had lost. An archetype is a tough idea to define with any of the five senses. Sight, hearing, and even interaction through the spoken or written word all end up being inadequate when trying to define archetypes.
They are not bound by time or space, previous or future, and they play in dimensions the majority of us can only dream of. We might recognize an archetype by the tracks it makes, by the result it leaves in our lives in the type of unusual occurrences, discoveries, or wonderful minutes.
A more popular definition of acknowledging an archetype might be a stunning coincidence. Carl Jung devoted his life to this look for the something not viewed. He wrote of archetypes: The collective unconscious is a part of the psyche which can be negatively differentiated from an individual unconscious by the truth that it does not, like the latter, owe its existence to individual experience and as a result it is not an individual acquisition.
Whereas the personal unconsciousness consists for the many part of complexes, the material of the collective unconscious is comprised essentially of archetypes. Read More Here of the archetypeindicates the presence of guaranteed kinds in the mind which seem to be present constantly and all over. [The instincts] type extremely close examples to the archetypes, so close, in reality, that there is great factor for supposing that the archetypes are the unconscious pictures of the impulses themselves, in other words, that they are patterns of instinctual behaviour.
Although he regularly made subtle referrals to the presence of archetypes in other areas of life, the mass of his released product deals just with the psychological aspects. Another more magical and less psychological way of viewing the archetypes is to see them as emanations stemming from the Godhead. The Godhead is one, undivided, the All-That-Is in a state of beingness where there is not, for all is.