7 Things You Should Not Do With 우리카지노

Characteristic of Moon:

™

Astrological significance of Moon:

Debilitated moon:

Results of debilitated Moon for different ascendants:

Aries: Moon placed in 8th house in the state of debilitation indicates hard childhood, diseases related to cold and cough, chronicle diseases; this position is not favourable for mother/maternal relatives.

Taurus: Moon placed in 7th house indicates marital discord, loose morality, dissatisfaction with life partner, loose morality, many obstacles in career and misfortune after marriage.

Gemini: placement of Moon in 6th house indicates loss of inheritance, financial constraints, loss of accumulated wealth and suffering from the ailments of throat, eyes and mouth.

Cancer: debilitated Moon posited in 5th house shows cruel and cunning nature of the native, suffering from offspring's, unfortunate love affairs resulting in emotional breakdown, inclination for malefic deeds.

Leo: placement of Moon in 4th house is inauspicious for family life; the native will be extremely emotional, problems related with conveyance and property, faces disgrace due to his stupid deeds.

Virgo: Moon in 3rd house lays obstacles in flow of income, discord with females, unfulfilled desires and dissatisfaction.

Libra: Moon placed in 2nd house indicates financial and family constraints, always unsuccessfulness; due to bad karma the native loses the inheritance and parental property and having malefic speech.

Scorpio: in ascendant Moon indicates egoistic nature, unsuccessfulness due to careless and extreme emotional nature, diseases of cold and cough are predicated.

Sagittarius: Moon in 12th house indicates fear and inferiority complex, limitation, hindrance, enforced retirement, sickness due to acts of indiscretion, enmities with females causing worry and trouble, due to extravagant nature repayment of loan becomes tough.

Capricorn: in 11th house Moon lays obstacles in married life, desertion by near ones and getting success in career after crossing many hurdles.

Aquarius: Moon in 10th signifies the disgrace in life due to malefic mentality, profession/occupation demanding constant change/voyage/travelling, dispute with government, constant suffering from disease/ loan/enemies, fluctuation in business/ occupation/profession, unsuccessfulness in any work, public scandal and censure.

Pisces: Debilitated Moon posited in 9th house indicates misfortune due to offspring, less progeny, disgrace for father, due to failed love affairs the native has to face disgrace with broken education.

BY

GEETA JHA [SPIRITUAL HEALER]

INDIA

Even though it is our planet's nearest neighbor in Space, Earth's large Moon can hide many of its ancient secrets very well as it does its bewitching, bewildering dance around our planet--reflecting sunlight like a mirror into the starlit sky above the Earth. Our Moon is a mysterious inspiration for poetry and myth, as well as a long-standing symbolic source of madness. But where did Earth's Moon come from? The leading theory explaining our Moon's ancient birth is called the Giant Impact Hypothesis, which proposes that our Moon came into being as the result of a catastrophic blast between the primeval Earth and a wandering, ill-starred Mars-sized protoplanet that astronomers have named Theia. In September 2016, planetary scientists announced that their data confirm one particular scenario that explains this tragic blast in the past, suggesting that the migrating Theia crashed into Earth--and pulverized it like a bowling ball hitting a watermelon.

About 4.56 billion years ago, when our newborn Solar System was still in the process of forming, Theia hit the proto-Earth and blasted much of our infant planet to smithereens. As a result of this horrific ancient collision, Earth's rocks did not merely melt--they vaporized! The elements in those Earth rocks turned into a gas in the same way that boiling water turns into steam. Ultimately, what remained of the original pre-collision Earth cooled off, and it again formed a solid planet. What remained of the ancient blast became the Moon.

This is the latest interpretation of a decades-old theory explaining where Earth's lunar companion came from, and it is based on recent measurements of elements contained in both the Earth and its Moon. The planetary scientists propose that their new measurements, which they have obtained of an element found within both Earth and lunar rocks, presents a challenge to the leading hypothesis of our Moon's mysterious origins. Extremely small variations in the segregation of the isotopes of potassium between Earth and Moon were hidden like a buried treasure beneath the detection limits of analytical techniques until now.

However, this changed in 2015 when Washington University in St. Louis (WUSTL) geochemist Dr. Kun Wang, then a Harvard Origins of Life Initiative Prize postdoctoral fellow, and Dr. Stein Jacobsen, professor of geochemistry at Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts, developed a technique for analyzing these isotopes with a precisions 10 times better than the best of all previous methods.

Dr. Wang and Dr. Jacobsen report in their new study that isotopic differences between Earth and Moon rocks reveal the first experimental evidence that can discriminate between the two leading scenarios explaining lunar origins. According to the first scenario, a low-energy collision leaves in its wake both a proto-Earth and Moon blanketed in an obscuring silicate atmosphere; in the second, a much more catastrophic blast vaporizes Theia and most of the proto-Earth, expanding to create an immense superfluid disk out of which Earth's Moon ultimately forms.

The new isotopic study strengthens the case for a high-energy scenario, and it is published in the September 12, 2016 online edition of the journal Nature. "Our results provide the first hard evidence that the impact really did (largely) vaporize Earth," Dr. Wang commented in a September 12, 2016 WUSTL Press Release. Dr. Wang is an assistant professor of Earth and Planetary Sciences in the School of Arts and Sciences at WUSTL.

The Lunatic, The Lover, And The Poet

Earth's silvery Moon hangs suspended in the starlit night sky above our world. Because of its great beauty and mysterious, glowing nighttime nature, Earth's Moon throughout the eons has been the inspiration for stories, myths, poetry, and magical tales. It has also served as an ancient symbol for that which is feminine, as well as for romantic love and lunacy. Some folk tales and children's stories mention the "Man in the Moon", because--with a little bit of imagination--it looks like a man's face has been etched on our lunar companion's distant surface. Other tales involve a "Moon Rabbit". Fantasy and fiction aside, our Earth's beguiling Moon is a very real small world in its own right. Earth's Moon has been with us almost from the very start, when our Sun and its assortment of planets, moons, asteroids, and comets, were first forming about 4.6 billion years ago. It is also the only world beyond Earth that we have walked upon, leaving our footprints behind in the Moon-dust--a silent testimony whispering that once we did exist, and that we had been there.

Even though most planetary scientists think that Earth's Moon is the tattle-tale relic of an ancient catastrophic collision between Earth and the tragedy that was Theia, efforts to confirm this leading theory of lunar formation have been difficult. This is because demonstrating the reality of this proposed ancient wreck depends on measurements of the ratios between the isotopes of silicon, titanium, oxygen, and others. These ratios are known to differ throughout our entire Solar System, and the great likeness between our planet and its Moon contradicts theoretical models of the ancient catastrophe. The reason is that these models propose that our Moon would have formed primarily from the wreckage of the catastrophically pulverized Theia. Therefore, our Moon would have to be compositionally different from Earth.

The eight major planets of our Solar System possess their own unique composition that can be determined by scientists studying isotopes. Isotopes are variants of chemical elements such as the element oxygen seen in cosmic samples. In order for the Giant Impact Hypothesis to work as an explanation--proposing that a unique Solar System object crashed into the ancient Earth, and that its resulting collision-related debris made a significant contribution to the composition of Earth's Moon--the Earth and its Moon should show differing ratios of elemental isotopes. However, this is not the case--our planet and its mysterious Moon are almost identical twins in composition.

In 2001, a team of planetary scientists from the Carnegie Institution of Washington reported the most exact measurement so far of the isotopic signatures of Moon rocks. To the scientists' amazement, they found that the rocks obtained from the Apollo missions of the late 1960s and early 1970s contained an isotopic signature that was identical to Earth rocks, and were different from almost all of the other bodies in our Solar System. Because most of the debris that entered orbit around our primordial planet eventually coagulated to form the Moon, and it was then thought to have come from the pulverized Theia, this new observation was surprising. In 2007, planetary scientists from the California Institute of Technology (Caltech) in Pasadena, California announced that there was less than a 1% chance that Theia and Earth had identical isotopic signatures. An analysis published in 2012, of the titanium isotopes found in the Apollo lunar samples showed that Earth's Moon has the same composition as Earth. This conflicts with what is expected if Earth's lunar companion had been born far from Earth's orbit or from Theia.

In order to explain this very unlikely similarity, planetary scientists had to come up with a way to form the Moon mostly from the Earth--and not Theia. Dr. Wang was fascinated by a new computer model that had made its debut in the spring of 2016 at the annual Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. In this new computer model, Theia crashed into the infant Earth with such violence that both Earth's mantle and Theia vaporized.

Giant impacts are generally thought to have been frequent occurrences in the early days of our Solar System. Indeed, supercomputer simulations modeling a giant impact are consistent with measurements of the angular momentum of the Earth-Moon system and the small size of the lunar core.

The Moon, The Mantle, And A Mars-Sized Tragedy

In the middle of the 1970s, two independent teams of astrophysicists first proposed that Earth's Moon was the result of a grazing type of collision between Theia and the proto-Earth. Indeed, the Giant Impact Hypothesis explains quite well a number of important observations, such as the large size of the Moon relative to our planet.

The great quantity of energy liberated in the catastrophic impact event, and the eventual re-accretion of ejected material in Earth orbit, would have melted the outer shell of our planet, thus creating an ocean of searing-hot and fiery magma. The newborn Moon would also have had its own magma ocean. Estimates for the depth of the primeval lunar ocean range from about 300 miles to the entire radius of the Moon, which is 1,079 miles.

Planetary bodies that are born in differing regions of our Solar System have different isotopic compositions. For this reason, different isotopic signatures serve as "fingerprints" for planets and meteorites derived from the same object. The chance that Theia--a wandering refugee from elsewhere in our Solar System--just happened to have the same isotopic signature as Earth is extremely small.

Therefore, the Giant Impact Hypothesis had a serious problem. It was able to account for a large number of the physical characteristics of the Earth-Moon system but not their geochemistry. The isotopic composition research triggered an "isotopic crisis" for this otherwise favored hypothesis.

Initially, planetary scientists thought more exact measurements could resolve the mess. However, the more precise measurements of oxygen isotopes published in 2016 only managed to confirm that the isotopic compositions of Earth and Moon are identical. "These are the most precise measurements we can make, and 메리트카지노 they're still identical," Dr. Wang commented in the September 12, 2016 WUSTL Press Release.

According to the Giant Impact Hypothesis, the impact melted Earth's shell and the entire tragic Theia--hurling some of the melt outward. However, one model that was proposed in 2007 adds a silicate vapor atmosphere around the proto-Earth and the lunar disk--which is the magma disk that is the residue of the pulverized impactor. The theory suggests that the silicate vapor allowed exchange between the Earth, the vapor, and the material within the disk--before the Moon had a chance to condense from the melted disk.

"They're trying to explain the isotopic similarities by addition of this atmosphere, but they still start from a low-energy impact like the original model," Dr. Wang noted in the September 12, 2016 WUSTL Press Release.

However, exchanging material through an atmosphere can be extremely slow, according to Dr. Wang. This means that there would not have been enough time for the material to mix completely before it began to tumble back down to Earth.

The new model assumes that the impact was an extremely violent event. Indeed, according to this model, the impact would have been so extraordinarily violent that Theia and Earth's mantle would vaporize--and then mix themselves up together to form a dense melt and vapor mantle atmosphere that spread out to fill a space that was over 500 times larger than our planet is today. As this atmosphere cooled off, the Moon condensed from it.

The complete mixing of this atmosphere does explain the identical isotope composition of Earth and Moon, Dr. Wang believes. The mantle atmosphere was a supercritical fluid that did not have distinct liquid and gas phases. Supercritical fluids are able to travel through solids like a gas--and dissolve materials like a liquid.

The new research reports precise potassium isotopic data for a representative sample of Earth and Moon rocks. Potassium has three stable isotopes, but only two of them, potassium-41 and potassium-39, are abundant enough to be measured precisely for this study.

Dr. Wang and Dr. Jacobsen examined seven Moon rock samples obtained from different lunar missions and compared their potassium isotope ratios to those of eight Earth rocks representative of Earth's mantle. The two planetary scientists discovered that the Moon rocks were enriched by approximately 0.4 parts per thousand in the heavier isotope of potassium, potassium-41.

According to Dr. Wang, the only high-temperature process that could separate the potassium isotopes in this way is incomplete condensation of the potassium from the vapor phase during lunar formation. Compared to the lighter isotope, the heavier isotope would preferentially separate from the vapor and then condense.

However, calculations reveal that if this process happened in a complete vacuum, it would lead to an enrichment of heavy potassium isotopes in lunar samples of approximately 100 parts per thousand. This is considerably higher than the value Dr. Wang and Dr. Jacobsen found. However, higher pressure would be able to suppress fractionation, according to Dr. Wang. For this reason, he and his colleagues predict that Earth's Moon instead condensed in a pressure that amounted to roughly 10 times the sea level atmospheric pressure on our planet.

The new study's finding that Moon rocks are enriched in the heavier potassium isotope does not favor the silicate atmosphere scenario, which predicts lunar rocks will contain less of the heavier isotope than Earth rocks. This is the very opposite of what the planetary scientists found.

Instead it supports the mantle atmosphere model that predicts Moon rocks will contain more of the heavier isotope than Earth rocks.

Rocks are very good at keeping secrets. However, potassium isotopes are tattle-tales--and they have quite a story to tell.