Skip to main contentdfsdf

Blog 6

from web site

Illustration of the Human Rights Day theme

When considered as a sociopolitical idea, human rights have its roots in people's innate need for security, which is why rights-based laws are explicitly justified. The Western interpretation of human rights that the United Nations (UN) adopted aims to assert that people everywhere and at all times demand some minimal standards of treatment by society due to their human nature. It does this by drawing on natural law and political concepts (Sarbani, 2010). The idea of human rights continues to be one of the most contentious issues in political science, despite efforts by the UN and a growing number of governments to codify them through resolutions, covenants, treaties, and monitoring bodies.

As of right now, the UDHR is regarded as the normative hub from which a variety of legal tools have arisen to safeguard and advance human rights. Nevertheless, because of its significance, the international human rights infrastructure has been interpreted in a way that raises the question of how human rights relate to the declarations, treaties, and body of international law that has developed over the past few decades. The aforementioned tools do indeed shape human rights on a purely procedural level, but this perspective is fundamentally flawed because these tools only serve to declare, protect, ensure, implement, monitor, and observe human rights. In different ways over time and space, the ontological question of contemporary human rights has been developed.

Written By: Name Style

 

 

amanoliver

Saved by amanoliver

on Dec 03, 22