JOANNA AXELROD, ESCONDIDO PUBLIC LIBRARY, CA
Whether she's moderating a book club or texting reminders to teenage community volunteers, youth services librarian Joanna Axelrod speaks the language of teens and tweens. She finds out what they want and develops services so the Escondido Public Library can meet those needs.
"You can't be intimidated or hesitant to get in their faces and talk to them," says Axelrod. "Developing personal relationships, especially with teens, is so important."
Those relationships are the key to giving teens positive adult role models, obtaining honest feedback about library collections, and getting youth to participate, Axelrod says.
Axelrod earned "street cred" with teens in 2008, when she won a regional texting championship, says Cynthia Smith, deputy city librarian. The "Texting Librarian," as the Escondido library has dubbed her, is constantly improving her tech skills, Smith says. (Axelrod says that she types 90 words a minute and sends 1500 texts a month.) Her tech savvy not only earns her respect from teens, it also gives her new tools to incorporate into her programs.
But Axelrod's success is more about people skills than technology. When she became a youth librarian in 2007, she expanded the existing teen library advisory council. The renamed Crafty C.A.T.S. (Community Action Teen Services) participants had a new focus--Escondido. Teens and tweens of both genders paint over graffiti and knit caps for newborns and chemotherapy patients and blankets for the local animal shelter.
Axelrod also started the monthly In BeT(w)een Book Club (at the library and online at escoteens.ning.com/group/inbetweenbookclub) and put on a "Twilight" prom.
"She's just the personification of what teen librarians need to be doing," Smith says. "She takes kids to the next level and actually gets them interested in reading."
As a result, the number of teens who signed up for the summer reading program increased from 206 in 2007 to 537 in 2010. Historically, about a third of the teens completed the program, but under Axelrod's leadership, 55 percent have, says Smith. And 50 teens volunteered to help with the library's 2010 summer children's reading program. Axelrod has shared tips on engaging teens and tweens at California Library Association and American Library Association conferences.
Her attitude picks up where her actions leave off. "I'm the antithesis of the stereotypical librarian," Axelrod says. "I'm young, energetic, outgoing, loud, and personable. These qualities really work to my advantage."
VitalsCURRENT POSITION Youth Services Librarian II
DEGREE Master of Science in Information, summa cum laude, University of Michigan School of Information, Ann Arbor, 2005
COLLEAGUES CALL HER "Library Barbie" for wearing stylish sparkly fashion
FOLLOW @escolibrary; so-calconnection.blogspot.com
PHOTO (COLOR)
" Txting 2 Lrn
Author(s):
Trubek, Anne
Source:
Instructor, v121 n5 p49-50 Spr 2012. 2 pp.
Peer Reviewed:
No
ISSN:
1049-5851
Descriptors:
Telecommunications, Handheld Devices, Educational Technology, Adolescents, Literacy Education, Teaching Methods, Phonology, Reading Skills, Secondary Education
Abstract:
The average American teen texts a lot: 3,339 messages per month, according to a recent Nielsen survey. That's more than 130 of them a day, everyday or a text every 10 minutes, almost around the clock. However one looks at it, cell phones have revolutionized the way kids communicate. How should teachers respond? Historian Niall Ferguson's opinion piece in "Newsweek," "Texting Makes U Stupid," exemplifies the general line of attack: Teens who text do not read books, he asserts. Such attacks are easy to find--perhaps because they're easy to write. They are not based on research. In fact, if one looks at studies on texting, a different conclusion emerges: Texting increases literacy, and it improves, of all things, spelling. This article offers tips on how to incorporate texting into one's lessons.
Abstractor:
ERIC
Number of Pages:
2
Publication Type:
Journal Articles; Reports - Descriptive
Availability:
Full Text from ERIC Available online: http://www.eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ973527
Scholastic. 557 Broadway, New York, NY 10012. Tel: 800-724-6527; Tel: 866-436-2455; Web site: http://teacher.scholastic.com/products/instructor/subscribe.asp
URL:
http://teacher.scholastic.com/products/instructor/index.htm
Journal Code:
AUG2012
Entry Date:
2012
Accession Number:
EJ973527
Database:
ERIC
Full Text Database:
Academic Search Complete
Translate Full Text:
HTML Full Text
Txting 2 Lrn
Contents
ONLINE TOOLS
Two recent studies show texting improves spelling
The average American teen, you may not be shocked to discover, texts a lot: 3,339 messages per month, according to a recent Nielsen survey. Girls outpace boys, averaging more than 4,000 texts per month. That's more than 130 of them a day, every day, or a text every 10 minutes, almost around the clock. However you look at it, cell phones have revolutionized the way kids communicate.
How should teachers respond? Chances are you have a colleague who laments texting as a sign of declining standards and a contributor to illiteracy. Historian Niall Ferguson's opinion piece in Newsweek, "Texting Makes U Stupid," exemplifies the general line of attack: Teens who text do not read books, he asserts. And they have no interest in culture: "Show a teenager Botticelli's Adoration of the Magi. You might get a cursory glance before a buzz signals the arrival of the latest SMS."
Such attacks are easy to find--perhaps because they're easy to write. They are not based on research. (No negative association has been made between texting and reading skills.) In fact, if we look at studies on texting, a different conclusion emerges: Texting increases literacy, and it improves, of all things, spelling. Turn the page to find out how, and to discover the best ways to incorporate texting into your lessons.
FACT: Texting helps students read.
A British study published in the Journal of Computer Assisted Learning found a positive correlation between texting and literacy, concluding that texting was "actually driving the development of phonological awareness and reading skill in children." In other words, contrary to what you might think when faced with "creative" usages such as ur for your, 2 for to, and w8 for wait, kids who text may be stronger readers and writers than those who don't.
FACT: Texting boosts phonology.
To abbreviate message as msg or tonight as 2nite, you have to understand how sounds and letters work, or how words are put together. Texting encourages students to think about these relationships, helping them to understand how words are built. A study in the Australian Journal of Educational Development & Psychology showed that texting improves spelling because it increases these phonological skills.
FACT: Students know when not to text.
If you're worried about grading a pile of The Catcher in the Rye essays written in text speak, fear not. In research conducted for a dissertation at the City University in London, graduate student Veenal Raval found that most students avoid textisms in their schoolwork. "They are able to 'code-switch' the same way that I would… use slang when speaking to my friends and adopt a more formal means when talking to colleagues," Raval told the Telegraph. In other words, students change how they spell according to the circumstances and the audience. They know to spell out the word tomorrow in a paper, but when making plans with friends, they go with torn.
FACT: Texting is a fun way to play with words.
Why would an educator ever want to discourage kids from playing with words? The more adventurous kids are with spelling, usage, and grammar the better. Rather than pulling out our hair, we should remember that texting is writing. And srsly, what tableau could be more LOL-worthy than a gaggle of children sitting quietly by their lockers, writing away?
FACT: Inventing new textisms is creative.
Creating a textism isn't easy. You have to break the word into something short and catchy without sacrificing meaning. Try it: Choose a longish word, and come up with an abbreviation you might use in a text. The 160-character limit promotes creativity among texters just as tight metrical and rhyming patterns do among poets.
FACT: Textisms have historical roots.
Abbreviations are a natural part of the evolution of language. OK, the most popular American word in the world, was invented during the age of the telegraph, because it was concise. Teachers found OK as inappropriate then as they do c u !8r today. But OK found its way into our lexicon soon enough, and these days we couldn't do without it. The most popular textisms are already becoming official: The Oxford English Dictionary added OMG last year. New technologies--from the printing press to the telegraph to the cell phone--inevitably inspire new spelling, new abbreviations, and new words.
FACT: Texting does not distract students.
Well, it's no more of a distraction than the time-honored habit of secretly passing notes (those kids--always writing!). It is just the latest back channel for students to use during class. Of course, teachers should have rules about when kids can text, and for what reason. Not because texting itself is bad, but because students should be paying attention to the teacher.
Other than setting firm cell-phone policies, one way to minimize back-channnel texting is to openly embrace the platform in your classroom as a tool for learning. Your willingness to explore students' favorite form of communication may help to establish mutually respectful boundaries. See our fresh ideas for incorporating texting into your lessons on the next page."