The author, Julie Coiro, is a standout in the field of digital and information literacy, but I am not surprised by her research findings that more than 70 percent of 700 middle-schoolers demonstrated "shortcomings" in ability to critically evaluate information.
Why should kids know how to evaluate online information, when we really don't teach them how to evaluate information in general?
That doesn't diminish or take away from Coiro's assertion that "the problem is not likely to go away without intervention during regular content area instruction." I agree. Let's teach critical literacies across the content areas.
The remainder of Coiro's column seeks to address this question: "So, what can you do to more explicitly teach adolescents how to evaluate the quality of online information?" What would be interesting is to engage preservice teachers in a dialogue about how Coiro's suggestions for critical evaluation of online sources apply (or, do not apply) to ALL sources of information.