• Authorities justified the arrests through a myriad of laws that criminalize expression deemed to cause panic, instigate violence, spread hate, or insult officials, among other perceived harms
• By passing new laws and arresting individuals for nonviolent speech, leaders attempted to control narratives about the virus’s spread, the government’s performance, and the negative social and economic implications of lockdowns.
• In one of the world’s harshest examples, Zimbabwe’s emergency provisions have put internet users at risk of up to 20 years in prison for spreading false information about the pandemic
• Even governments that have historically protected online free expression have responded disproportionately to pandemic-related speech. South Africa rolled out state-of-disaster regulations that bar statements through “any medium, including social media” if they are intended to deceive someone about the virus, government actions, or a person’s infection status. Celebrity entertainer Somizi Mhlongo was criminally charged after suggesting on Instagram that the country’s transport minister planned to extend the country’s lockdown.

2 more annotations...

• authorities around the world have sought to implement quite extraordinary policies
• “collateral damage” (a military euphemism for wartime civilian casualties)
• A central part of selling these extreme, and ultimately highly destructive, policies has involved the use of propaganda.
• propensity of those with power to define themselves as the arbiters of truth and moralit
• he propensity of those with power to define themselves as the arbiters of truth and morality
• techniques of manipulation are part and parcel of contemporary liberal democracies
• techniques of manipulation are part and parcel of contemporary liberal democracies.
• many forms of “non-consensual persuasion” have been employed, ranging from manipulated messaging designed to increase “fear levels” through to coercion
• behavioural scientists were providing advice to the UK government’s Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE)
• Laura Dodsworth’s influential work State of Fear
• remarkable reluctance of anyone in authority to accept responsibility for the deliberate manipulation of the public
• World Health Organisation (WHO) had established the Technical Advisory Group on Behavioural Insights and Sciences for Health (TAG)
• One aspect of the COVID-19 event propaganda has been the aggressive promotion of official narratives
• drive to ensure that certain voices, claims and arguments either never see the light of day or otherwise remain contained within “fringe” or “alternative” circles.
• superficially well-meaning attempts to manage what has been increasingly labelled as “misinformation” and “disinformation”
• military involvement
• World Health Organisation (WHO)
• In a release titled “Let’s flatten the infodemic curve”, they advise people to refer to “factcheckers” and legacy media
• major consequences in terms of suppression of debate
• direct censorship through removal of content and deplatforming, sponsoring of hostile coverage designed to smear and intimidate anyone raising critical questions regarding the COVID-19 narrative, and coercive approaches involving threats to livelihood and employment.
• suppression has operated in at least three different ways: direct censorship through removal of content and deplatforming, sponsoring of hostile coverage designed to smear and intimidate anyone raising critical questions regarding the COVID-19 narrative, and coercive approaches involving threats to livelihood and employment
• otable removals from YouTube included interviews with Dr John Ioannidis of Stanford University and British physician Professor Karol Sikora
• Dr Robert Malone
• removed from Twitter.
• a given post violates “community standards” in some way and some, such as LinkedIn, state that content at variance with authorities can lead to censoring
• Suppression of inconvenient opinions works through both the realm of information – censoring a person’s voice or ad hominem attacks – but also through action in the real, “material”, world via coercion
• Overall, the role of authorities in enabling censorship and coercion results in, broadly speaking, an institutionalised culture in which suppression of opinions and debate becomes the norm.
• ilencing the expression of an opinion robs us all of the opportunity to either hear an argument that might turn out to be true, or refine or reject an opinion that is faulty
• All silencing of discussion is an assumption of infallibility
• we are talking about the right of people to raise questions and concerns about policies that directly affect them, such as lockdown, masking and ‘vaccinations’, and, moreover, the right of credentialed experts to raise such questions in the public sphere
• mis/disinformation fact checking industry
• “combat the growing scourge of COVID-19 misinformation” which is described as a “virus spread by people”
• entails the move to a world where the truth is defined by factcheckers and authorities, and legislation provides the underlying coercive framework to ensure any deviance is punished. This is entirely at odds with basic principles of open debate, objective scholarship and freedom of expression and is not compatible with democracy.
• a large number of medical scientists who have been at the receiving end of drives to suppress debate
• the official COVID-19 response has been underpinned by ferocious propaganda campaigns designed to silence any experts speaking truth to power
• Ending any semblance of democracy may indeed be the goal, starting with the ending of freedom of expression.

34 more annotations...

• their culture’s understanding that having intellectuals means allowing people to make controversial statements that progress the social conversation.
• migrant labor, often illegal, is easier to exploit, cheaper, and increases consumption
• The use of social welfare as a means of support for migrants rather than as a means to support citizens has placed Renaud Camus, who began his life as a socialist, on the right.
• a politician is elected that makes life better so that you have more friends and a healthier social life, or a politician is elected that allows Meta to make you AI friends, substituting human relationships with an artificial replacement?
• Renaud Camus has before called himself a racist. He does so because, in his own words, “anti-racist has changed” and therefore so has “racist.”  When he says he is racist, he is referring to the use of the term “race” before the advent of what was called “scientific racism.”
• the problem with anti-racism: there is no way to discuss race because to discuss race is to discuss differences, which is to discriminate—in the most classic sense of the word as to recognize a distinction between things—which means to be racist
• While Kendi makes allowances for ethnicities, nationalities, and individuals, the practice of anti-racist thinking does not
• He believes it is good for France to be French and that keeping France French is preferable to making France not French
• in Europe is that the pressure is towards seperatism, cantons, enclaves; a fragmented society far more than a creolized one.
• Culture is real. Want proof? In Montana, nude hot springs are maintained not by law, but by norm; there are none in Pakistan. 
• If you are French and take issue with the idea of “France for the French”, because you are motivated to ask, “What is French?” Renaud Camus sees you as a decultured victim of the Little Replacement, a person severed from your heritage and culture, a human whose humanity has been replaced with pop culture, a human so impoverished by education that you were not educated about the national family into which you were born. Your silver spoon was taken from your mouth and replaced with heavy-metal tested baby formula.
• Throughout time, great writers, poets, and musicians have taken on words for monsters in revolt. They often have a strange way of winning.
• A shared language and set of ideas united people and allowed them to forge an alternative to ten thousand years of kings and slavery
• culturally secure and humanistic laïcité
• “framework for living together” secured not by a united culture, but by batons, by cops in every classroom;
• f a change in population of 10% is worthy of a name, then it’s not inappropriate to call the current change process in Europe the Great Replacement
• Like Renaud Camus’ Great Replacement, Renaud Camus’ remigration, decolonization, is already a fact.
• Camus calls himself a racist as an incendiary attack on mainstream society
• Understanding takes an open mind, patience, and a willingness to learn and listen. Understanding requires curiosity about why things that sound strange and incendiary may not be.
• He beat you because when they said mass migration was good for the economy, hundreds of millions of people patiently waited and saw themselves become poorer.
• American culture has always paired rude lay culture attitudes about race, sex, and religion, with resentment, humor, and egalitarianism

19 more annotations...

• “Be careful who you pretend to be.”
• “We are what we pretend to be, so we must be careful about what we pretend to be.”
• Mother Night.
• neoliberal monsters
• thoroughly betrayed what they previously upheld as their core values
• they closely resemble the people they used to unsuccessfully attempt to “wake up” through protest — callous, disinterested and pre-programmed.
• Neoliberalism is the flip side of the coin that has neo-conservatism on the other side.
• They never discuss the war crimes and all around hawkishness of the Democratic administrations for which they voted.
• So-called radicals, would-be revolutionaries, pretended to understand that the liberation of the human race had to derive from The People ourselves and would never be issued to us by means of an intrinsically corrupt political system
• Yet, when their supposedly “lesser-of-two-evils” candidates win, the lesser-of-two-evils voters behave as though they are satiated
• silence necessary critiques that should be brought forth resoundingly against unacceptable policies (irrespective of party affiliation).
• the hypocrisy of The New Neoliberals is acute, pronounced and absurd
• dehumanizing medical mandates
• shun the vaccine injured
• Genocide in Gaza — when Democrats do genocide, it’s genocide-light. You know, like Bud-light or Marlboro-light. Genocide under a democratic administration is the low calorie version.
• War with nuclear potential in Ukraine
• Censorship
• It was the “liberals”, however, (well groomed by neoliberalism) who spearheaded “cancel culture” and various censorship measures in the name of biosecurity during Covid
• Their tendency to overreact indicates the burdensome cost of sustaining a contradiction over a prolonged period of time.

17 more annotations...